2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of land-use changes on soil hydraulic properties: Implications for runoff generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

43
252
6
21

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
43
252
6
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Zimmermann et al [48] investigated soil hydraulic properties, including hydraulic conductivity at different depths under primary and cleared secondary forest, teak, pasture, and secondary forest after banana-cacao or pasture land types. The authors observed that soil K sat decreases were proportional to the land use intensity; for example, areas with less intense land-use (secondary forest and banana) prior to reforestation had similarK sat values [48].…”
Section: Effect Of Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zimmermann et al [48] investigated soil hydraulic properties, including hydraulic conductivity at different depths under primary and cleared secondary forest, teak, pasture, and secondary forest after banana-cacao or pasture land types. The authors observed that soil K sat decreases were proportional to the land use intensity; for example, areas with less intense land-use (secondary forest and banana) prior to reforestation had similarK sat values [48].…”
Section: Effect Of Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAO, 2005;Bradshaw et al, 2007;Van Dijk et al, 2009) whereas the effect of forestation on tropical dry-season flows is also under debate (Calder, 2005;Scott et al, 2005). The general contention is that the net effect of an increase in forest cover on dryseason flow depends on the "trade-off" between increases in Q due to enhanced soil water recharge on the one hand (as forestation generally increases soil macro-porosity and infiltration characteristics; Ilstedt et al, 2007;Bonell et al, 2010;Zimmermann et al, 2006Zimmermann et al, , 2010Hassler et al, 2011), and decreases in soil water reserves and Q on the other hand due to the higher water use of trees compared to crops, pasture, or scrubs (Bruijnzeel, 1989(Bruijnzeel, , 2004Jackson et al, 2005;Scott et al, 2005). Reviews of micro-scale (< 1 km 2 ) experimental catchment studies (e.g.…”
Section: H E Beck Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prediction was based on the fact that landscape physical characteristics such as water infiltration capacity and runoff coefficient vary among different land uses ZIMMERMANN et al, 2006). Our results do not support this hypothesis since the same number of water quality variables differed significantly between the rainy and dry seasons in pasture and sugarcane catchments.…”
Section: Conversion Of Pasture To Sugarcane Effectscontrasting
confidence: 69%