The Influence of Metamodeling Techniques on the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Radial Compressor Impeller

Abstract

Aerodynamic turbomachinery component design is a very complex task. Although modern CFD solvers allow for a detailed investigation of the flow, the interaction of design changes and the three dimensional flow field are highly complex and difficult to understand. Thus, very often a trial and error approach is applied and a design heavily relies on the experience of the designer and empirical correlations. Moreover, the simultaneous satisfaction of aerodynamic and mechanical requirements leads very often to tedious iterations between the different disciplines. Modern optimization algorithms can support the designer in finding high performing designs. However, many optimization methods require performance evaluations of a large number of different geometries. In the context of turbomachinery design, this often involves computationally expensive Computational Fluid Dynamics and Computational Structural Mechanics calculations. Thus, in order to reduce the total computational time, optimization algorithms are often coupled with approximation techniques often referred to as metamodels in the literature. Metamodels approximate the performance of a design at a very low computational cost and thus allow a time efficient automatic optimization. However, from the experiences gained in past optimizations it can be deduced that metamodel predictions are often not reliable and can even result in designs which are violating the imposed constraints. In the present work, the impact of the inaccuracy of a metamodel on the design optimization of a radial compressor impeller is investigated and it is shown if an optimization without the usage of a metamodel delivers better results. A multidisciplinary, multiobjective optimization system based on a Differential Evolution algorithm is applied which was developed at the von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics. The results show that the metamodel can be used efficiently to explore the design space at a low computational cost and to guide the search towards a global optimum. However, better performing designs can be found when excluding the metamodel from the optimization. Though, completely avoiding the metamodel results in a very high computational cost. Based on the obtained results in present work, a method is proposed which combines the advantages of both approaches, by first using the metamodel as a rapid exploration tool and then switching to the accurate optimization without metamodel for further exploitation of the design space.

Optimization of twisted blade of pump as turbine based on high dimensional surrogate model

“…More importantly, with the increase of dimension, the amount of computation is growing exponentially. In reference, 17 ANN combined with genetic algorithm is applied to the optimization of centrifugal impeller. In order to establish ANN model, even after learning 662 models, the accuracy of surrogate model cannot be fully guaranteed.…”

An Integrated Design and Optimization Approach for Radial Inflow Turbines—Part II: Multidisciplinary Optimization Design

“…It is well known that the design of radial inflow turbines is an inevitably multidisciplinary problem, which needs iterations between aerodynamic performance and mechanical feasibility. This complexity makes the design of radial inflow turbines a time-consuming task in the past decades and pushes forward tremendous growth in numerical optimization research [1][2][3] at the same time.…”

Artificial intelligence metamodel comparison and application to wind turbine airfoil uncertainty analysis

“…11,12 Due to the greatly reduced computational cost, the metamodeling techniques have been widely used for the analysis and design of engineering devices. 13,14 Typically, the applications of metamodeling techniques in turbomachinery design and analysis can be found in Chahine et al, 15 Mackman et al, 16 Sugimura et al, 17 Ma et al, 18 and Ju and Zhang. 19 One of the most important issues in metamodeling engineering problems is to evaluate the performances of metamodels and then select the most appropriate one for their design and analysis.…”