2020
DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2019.1707064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of neighbourhood crime on young people becoming not in education, employment or training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Young people living in rural areas have limiting factors (Simões, 2018) in order to ensure more efficient support, institutional arrangements and practices in various fields (social affairs, health, education, and employment) that do not meet the needs of young people can frustrate young people into giving up on employment (Rikala, 2020). Therefore, big city neighborhoods with high school dropout and high crime can impact the likelihood of young people engaging in educational and employment opportunities, as living in a disadvantaged neighborhood increases the likelihood of becoming a NEET (Karyda, 2020). Cajic-Seigneur and Hodgson (2016) and Agranovich (2020) stress that differences in the quality of provision of education in the district may increase inequalities experienced by young people in education or the labor market.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Of Neet Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young people living in rural areas have limiting factors (Simões, 2018) in order to ensure more efficient support, institutional arrangements and practices in various fields (social affairs, health, education, and employment) that do not meet the needs of young people can frustrate young people into giving up on employment (Rikala, 2020). Therefore, big city neighborhoods with high school dropout and high crime can impact the likelihood of young people engaging in educational and employment opportunities, as living in a disadvantaged neighborhood increases the likelihood of becoming a NEET (Karyda, 2020). Cajic-Seigneur and Hodgson (2016) and Agranovich (2020) stress that differences in the quality of provision of education in the district may increase inequalities experienced by young people in education or the labor market.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Of Neet Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berdasarkan jenis kelamin beberapa penelitian menghasilkan causal yang berbeda. Sedangkan tempat tinggal berkaitan dengan lingkungan sekitar, seperti disorganisasi sosial, yang dipahami sebagai tingkat kejahatan yang dialami, menjadi sinyal negatif pada pemuda dan cenderung kemungkinan NEET yang lebih tinggi (Karyda, 2020). Hal ini menunjukkan wilayah tempat tinggal menjadi salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi NEET.…”
Section: Tinjauan Teoritisunclassified
“…(Goldman-Mellor et al, 2015;Kraak, 2013). Other factors also associated with an increased probability of becoming NEET include: social exclusion from a group of peers at school; anti-social or disruptive behaviour (which covers interpersonal conflict, theft, property damage, and graffiti); exposure to aggressive behaviour both inside and outside school (e.g., shoplifting and fighting); and, substance abuse including frequent use of cannabis during adolescence Karyda, 2020).…”
Section: Socio-economic Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family-related socio-economic backgrounds predisposing towards NEET status are usually associated with numerous factors. These include: low levels of parental education and their disinterestedness towards education; unemployment; low household incomes and receipt of state benefits; living in large households; poor housing or high-risk housing situation; living in small, rural or remote settlements; or, in living in a neighbourhood with high crime rate play important role (Odoardi, 2019;Pitkänen et al, 2019;Duckworth & Schoon,2012;Karyda, 2020;Tamesberger & Bacher, 2014 ). Moreover, parental psychiatric disorder and substance abuse, poor parenting style or out-of-home placement can also play an important role (Pitkänen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Socio-economic Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%