1996
DOI: 10.1177/009102609602500202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Organizational Constituent Groups on Rater Attitudes toward Performance Appraisal Compliance

Abstract: This article presents the results of a survey questionnaire developed to ascertain which of three constituent groups (Superiors, Peers, and Subordinates) in the workplace has the greatest influence on rater compliance with employee performance appraisal guidelines. The research found that superiors had the greatest influence on rater compliance with rating procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of literature also reveals numerous rater-related factors which have influenced performance ratings: for example, raters' self-efficacy (see [11], self-monitoring (see [7], [8], [12], [13]) and rater trust or confidence in the appraisal system (see [8], [14]). A frequently studied factor is rater orientation to performance appraisal such as PAD (see [8] and [15]- [17].…”
Section: A Performance Appraisal System Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A review of literature also reveals numerous rater-related factors which have influenced performance ratings: for example, raters' self-efficacy (see [11], self-monitoring (see [7], [8], [12], [13]) and rater trust or confidence in the appraisal system (see [8], [14]). A frequently studied factor is rater orientation to performance appraisal such as PAD (see [8] and [15]- [17].…”
Section: A Performance Appraisal System Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequently studied factor is rater orientation to performance appraisal such as PAD (see [8] and [15]- [17]. Others have focused on accountability (see [10], [14]; PSK [18], perceived use(s) of performance appraisal [19], perceived effectiveness of performance appraisal [20]. The amount and level of training received and experience on the task are also said to be factors that influence rating accuracy [21].…”
Section: A Performance Appraisal System Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional findings indicate that leaders who are seen as challenging the status quo and encouraging subordinates' independent action are rated lower by their supervisor managers although their subordinates may rate them higher (Salam, Cox, & Sims, 1997); that supervisors generally have the greatest influence on rater compliance with rating procedures (Robinson, Fink, & Allen, 1996); that highly influential supervisors generally rate those employees that are highly compliant more favorably (Ralston & Waters, 1996); that assignees are generally rated more favorably by supervisors from the same nationality or race (Caligiuri & Day, 2000;Mount, Sytsma, Hazucha, & Holt, 1997); and that there is a tendency for supervisors to inflate subordinate ratings associated with high rater negative affectivity, low documentation of subordinates' work behaviors, and high appraisal visibility (Fried, Levi, Ben-David, & Tiegs, 1999). Interestingly there were three additional studies that focused specifically on communication issues.…”
Section: Ratermentioning
confidence: 99%