1990
DOI: 10.1016/0257-8972(90)90163-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of physical properties and spraying parameters on the creation of residual thermal stresses during the spraying process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the fact that the temperature of the Al 2 O 3 particles is well below their melting point in the DSC processes, resulted in a shot peening effect during the impact of each Al 2 O 3 particle on the substrate and thus a compressive stress is generated in the coating. In contrast, in the case of APS, the solidification of the molten Al 2 O 3 upon impacting the substrate causes a tensile residual stress, often called the quenching stress [17][18][19]. Finally, HA coatings are always characterized by a tensile residual stress [20] since it does not experience any phase transformation during the coating process unlike in the case of MAO coatings.…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, the fact that the temperature of the Al 2 O 3 particles is well below their melting point in the DSC processes, resulted in a shot peening effect during the impact of each Al 2 O 3 particle on the substrate and thus a compressive stress is generated in the coating. In contrast, in the case of APS, the solidification of the molten Al 2 O 3 upon impacting the substrate causes a tensile residual stress, often called the quenching stress [17][18][19]. Finally, HA coatings are always characterized by a tensile residual stress [20] since it does not experience any phase transformation during the coating process unlike in the case of MAO coatings.…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to methods 2 and 3, the unknown elastic modulus can be obtained by solving the equation Young's modulus of the coating can also be deduced by the first natural bending frequency. When this technique (method 5) is adopted, the specimen is usually supported so as to produce a free-body vibration, 17'18 and the first natural bending frequency f is given by f = 2rcL~ (12) where ~ = 4.73004, L is the specimen length and m is the specimen mass.…”
Section: Elastic Modulus Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%