1984
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198466020-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
46
0
9

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
46
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar experiments have been described by Andriacchi et al (1976). Brockhurst & Svensson (1977), Oh & Harris (1978), McBeath et al (1979), , Rohlman et al (1983), Huiskes (1980), Voilin (1983), Lewis et al (1984). and Panjabi et al (1985).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar experiments have been described by Andriacchi et al (1976). Brockhurst & Svensson (1977), Oh & Harris (1978), McBeath et al (1979), , Rohlman et al (1983), Huiskes (1980), Voilin (1983), Lewis et al (1984). and Panjabi et al (1985).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The reduction found by us is of the same magnitude as previously described by others. We have confirmed that a collar significantly increases calcar load even with the same stem design (see Oh & 27 29 22 59 75 82 49 42 68 75 80 04 46 41 63 50 80 83 62 44 75 84 82 85 38 33 66 68 81 83 55 39 54 69 79 81 29 32 56 47 74 84 54 41 67 72 83 84 76 82 44 38 46 71 67 44 63 83 85 84 40 41 60 62 81 84 52 32 62 62 80 Harris 1978, Lewis et al 1984, Ytteram et al 1980. The load reduction in the proximal femur seems to be large enough to explain the resorption of the calcar sometimes -seen clinically (Hierton et al 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore cobalt-chromium seems to be the best material for THA. Previous numerical models 43,44 have shown, however, that a cobalt-chromium stem unloads the proximal femur to a higher degree than a titanium stem and that this may enhance stress-shielding. 22,26 Theoretically, less stiff implants reduce stress within the stem and transfer load over a greater area of the cortical bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, the stress shielding effect is a dominant factor for loosening orthopedic and dental implants in bones due to the quantitative changes in the total bone mass and bone mineral density (BMD). 4,5) These changes are due to the bone functional adaptation for constructing a load bearing structure. 6) To prevent the stress shielding effect and to maintain normal functional adaptation in bone tissue near implants, the material properties and design of shape for implants should be optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%