2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10172-012-0128-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Radiation Model on the Distribution of Heat Flux in the Pusher Furnace / Wpływ Modelu Promieniowania Na Rozkład Gęstości Strumienia Ciepła W Piecu Przepychowym

Abstract: A three dimensional numerical model of the heat exchange during a charge heating process in a pusher furnace, using the finite element method, was used in this study. The radiative heat exchange in the furnace chamber was carried out based on two methods: the zone method and the method of basing on the average configuration ratio. In the zone method the flux of radiation energy reaching the surface of the heated charge was determined by performing calculations of brightness in a multi-surface closed system whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proper operation of the furnace can ensure minimization of heat consumption, scale loss as well as ensure high quality of the final products and semi-finished products [7][8][9]. Increasing the efficiency of heating furnaces is possible by modeling the phenomena occurring in them [10][11][12][13], including the oxidation of the charge [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper operation of the furnace can ensure minimization of heat consumption, scale loss as well as ensure high quality of the final products and semi-finished products [7][8][9]. Increasing the efficiency of heating furnaces is possible by modeling the phenomena occurring in them [10][11][12][13], including the oxidation of the charge [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emissivity ε 1 of the surface of the furnace walls is to be taken from the range of 0.75 to 0.85, depending on the type of the insulating material used in the furnace chamber. Emissivity ε 2 of the charge is to be determined from the equation [11]:…”
Section: The Model Of Heating a Charge In A Chamber Furnacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…to solve the equation (1), the finite element method (feM) was used, which is based on the solution of a system of partial differential equations: (11) where:…”
Section: (9)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…− average configuration coefficients, F 1 , F 2 -furnace and charge wall surface area, m 2 ε 2 -charge emissivity, e 1 , e 2 -density of own emission of wall and charge surface, W/m 2 P g1 , P g2 -transparency of the gas body radiation onto the charge and furnace wall surfaces, R 1 , R 2 -furnace and charge wall surface reflexivity, α k -convective coefficient of heat penetration at the charge surface, W/(m 2 K) T g , T 2 -absolute temperature of the furnace atmosphere and charge surface, K. The method of determination of average configuration coefficients and other parameters occurring in the formula (2) is presented in papers [11][12][13]. It was assumed that the combustion gases contain two radiating gases: CO 2 and H 2 O.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%