2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8sm01797b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of roughness on stem cell differentiation using 3D printed polylactic acid scaffolds

Abstract: With the increase in popularity of 3D printing, an important question arises as to the equivalence between devices manufactured by standard methods vs. those presenting with identical bulk specifications, but manufactured via fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,35 Feng et al suggested that such an uneven surface is a result of sharkskin surface instability. 43 Sharkskinlike surface irregularity has been reported in previous literature related to polymer extrusion. 32,43 Sharkskin surface on the extruded polymer is observed due to stress singularity developed at the nozzle exit, resulting in rapid tensile deformation of polymer molecules in the extrudate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,35 Feng et al suggested that such an uneven surface is a result of sharkskin surface instability. 43 Sharkskinlike surface irregularity has been reported in previous literature related to polymer extrusion. 32,43 Sharkskin surface on the extruded polymer is observed due to stress singularity developed at the nozzle exit, resulting in rapid tensile deformation of polymer molecules in the extrudate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…43 Sharkskinlike surface irregularity has been reported in previous literature related to polymer extrusion. 32,43 Sharkskin surface on the extruded polymer is observed due to stress singularity developed at the nozzle exit, resulting in rapid tensile deformation of polymer molecules in the extrudate. 32 As shown in Figure S5, the printed polymer fibers preserve the sharkskin patterns developed during extrusion, greatly reducing the optical transparency of the top surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It is known that the morphological characteristics of scaffolds, such as pore size and gap width between struts, affect cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation [ 190 ]. It is possible to control cell fate by modification of the structural properties of a scaffold [ 191 ]. Recently, 3D printing technology has been used to produce tailored PLA scaffolds for pulp tissue engineering.…”
Section: Synthetic Biomaterials Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a recent study by Feng and colleagues, they compared two different techniques in fabricating a PLA scaffold, either molding via standard extrusion processes or 3D printed, and its influence on dental pulp cells. The results indicated that manufacturing techniques can influence differences in cell migration, morphology, and differentiation marker expression [72]. Another study by Hu and colleagues used 3D printed molds to create cellularized conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration, which showed comparable results to the use of autografts in repairing peripheral nerve defects (Figure 3) [73].…”
Section: Pre-clinical and Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%