THE INFLUENCE OF SIMULATED ACIDIC RAIN ON VEGETATIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE TISSUES OF CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS SATIVUS L.)

Abstract

SUMMARYCucumis sativus L. plants were grown in the greenhouse and exposed 21 times to simulated acidic rain over a period of 6 weeks to compare the responses of vegetative and reproductive tissues. Chemical composition and temporal characteristics of rain were patterned according to rainfall in the growing season in the eastern US. Flowers were hand-pollinated to promote fruit set. Foliar symptoms were the most sensitive response of all the variables measured. Necrosis was visible after exposures to simulated acidic rain at pH 2-6, 30, and 3-4 but not at 3*8, 4-2, 46, 5"0, or 5*4. Despite these injury symptoms, there were no significant reductions in most measures of vegetative or reproductive tissues, even at pH 2-6. When durations of exposure were increased from 80 to 160 min, there was an increase in the severity of foliar injury, a significant reduction in dry mass of stems, numbers of female flowers produced and dry mass of flowers and immature fruit. However, there still were no significant reductions in numbers or weight of fruit, even though the plants were exposed to as much as a 20-fold greater deposition of acidity than ambient rainfall (average pH 4-0 to 4-3) in the north-eastern US. Evidently, cucumber plants have the capacity to recover and compensate for initial decreases in foliage and flower production, and the reproductive stage is not particularly susceptible to simulated acidic rain. These findings support previous results indicating that considerable increases in acidity of ambient rain would have to occur before the yield of crops would be measurably reduced.

Effects of simulated acid rain on uptake, accumulation, and retention of fluoride in forage crops

“…All solutions contained appropriate background ions and H2SO 4 and HNO 3 to maintain a 2 • 1 mass ratio of SO42-to NO3- (Jacobson et al, 1985). All solutions contained appropriate background ions and H2SO 4 and HNO 3 to maintain a 2 • 1 mass ratio of SO42-to NO3- (Jacobson et al, 1985).…”