2013
DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s51852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of socioeconomic status on women's preferences for modern contraceptive providers in Nigeria: a multilevel choice modeling

Abstract: BackgroundContraceptives are one of the most cost effective public health interventions. An understanding of the factors influencing users’ preferences for contraceptives sources, in addition to their preferred methods of contraception, is an important factor in increasing contraceptive uptake. This study investigates the effect of women’s contextual and individual socioeconomic positions on their preference for contraceptive sources among current users in Nigeria.MethodsA multilevel modeling analysis was cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study answered three research questions providing information on the individual-level and community-level determinants of modern contraceptive use among urban women in Nigeria – an African country with high fertility rate and low contraceptive prevalence rate. The finding that only two intrapersonal factors – parity and family planning self-efficacy – were significantly associated with modern contraceptive use is consistent with previous findings in the literature (Campbell et al 2006; Ezeh et al 2010; OlaOlorun and Hindin 2014; Lamidi, 2015; Dias and Oliveira, 2015; Aremu, 2013). However, these studies found significant positive associations between modern contraceptive use and other individual-level factors such as age, education, and household wealth, which this study did not find.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of this study answered three research questions providing information on the individual-level and community-level determinants of modern contraceptive use among urban women in Nigeria – an African country with high fertility rate and low contraceptive prevalence rate. The finding that only two intrapersonal factors – parity and family planning self-efficacy – were significantly associated with modern contraceptive use is consistent with previous findings in the literature (Campbell et al 2006; Ezeh et al 2010; OlaOlorun and Hindin 2014; Lamidi, 2015; Dias and Oliveira, 2015; Aremu, 2013). However, these studies found significant positive associations between modern contraceptive use and other individual-level factors such as age, education, and household wealth, which this study did not find.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A majority of the studies focused on assessing the effect of community socioeconomic status (wealth, education, and employment status) on modern contraceptive use (Lamidi, 2015; Dias and Oliveira, 2015; Aremu, 2013). These studies show a positive association between community socioeconomic status and modern contraceptive use; however, there is a need for evidence on other relevant community factors such as access to health services and fertility norms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multinomial logistic regression in the current study is consistent with other studies, showing the richest wealth quintile had significantly lower odds of unmet need for spacing in comparison to poorest wealth quintile [31]. Since stockouts of family planning methods are common in public health facilities in Nepal [32], poor women might not be able to afford to purchase them from private facilities and hence may experience unmet need.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, we found that the actual CPR is 81.3%. In BDHS report, women who were currently not in any marital relationship (1,033), had hysterectomy (932), postpartum amenorrheic (379), infertile or subfecund (78) and sexually inactive (3,711) were not excluded to calculate CPR. After excluding, we found that CPR is 81.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%