1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-474x(92)90044-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of storage structure on aflatoxin contamination in wheat and mustard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Toteja et al (2006) collected 1,646 wheat grain samples from different geographical regions of India and found AFB1 in 43% of them ranging from <5 to 606 μg/kg. In another study, Ranjan et al (1992) found aflatoxin levels in 50 wheat samples out of 197 collected from various places in India. Sinha and Sinha (1991) collected 416 samples consisting of wheat, gram and maize flours from various places in Bihar, India, and recorded 162 positive for aflatoxins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Toteja et al (2006) collected 1,646 wheat grain samples from different geographical regions of India and found AFB1 in 43% of them ranging from <5 to 606 μg/kg. In another study, Ranjan et al (1992) found aflatoxin levels in 50 wheat samples out of 197 collected from various places in India. Sinha and Sinha (1991) collected 416 samples consisting of wheat, gram and maize flours from various places in Bihar, India, and recorded 162 positive for aflatoxins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Due to surplus maize in the market after harvesting, coupled with low prices, farmers mainly store their maize to take advantage of higher prices of their produce when the demand is high (Suleiman and Kurt, 2015). In most tropical countries, harvested grains are mainly stored by farmers for considerable periods in various types of storage structures made of mud, bamboo strips and plastic sacks (Bilgami and Sinha, 1987;Ranjan et al, 1992;Kumar and Kalita, 2017). These unimproved traditional storage methods inevitably provide suitable conditions for the growth of insects and microorganisms responsible for the quality loss in stored grains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%