2008
DOI: 10.1080/00220270701813282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of task structure on students’ learning processes: observations from case studies in secondary school science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Williams and Clarke (1997) recognised that ''the association of particular learning consequences with the presence of complexity elements in tasks is certainly a suitable matter for further research' ' (p. 410). Later works of Race, Brown, and Smith (2005); Ainley, Pratt, and Hansen (2006) and McGregor (2008) support similar findings, discussing how task structure influences the student learning process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Williams and Clarke (1997) recognised that ''the association of particular learning consequences with the presence of complexity elements in tasks is certainly a suitable matter for further research' ' (p. 410). Later works of Race, Brown, and Smith (2005); Ainley, Pratt, and Hansen (2006) and McGregor (2008) support similar findings, discussing how task structure influences the student learning process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Such benefits include the development of higher order cognitive thinking; developments in interpersonal and social skills; and the facilitation of social interactions (Ben-Ari, 1998;Johnson & Johnson, 1992;McGregor, 2008;Newmann, Wehlage, & Lamborn, 1992;Slavin, 1992;Thorley & Gregory, 1994). Proponents of social constructivism (Kukla, 2000) argue that meaningful learning occurs when individuals are engaged in social activities.…”
Section: Individual V Collaborativementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Activities and discussions provided 'scaffolding', qualitatively different from general help or assistance because it was aimed at supporting the educators in recognising what constituted an enquiry and projecting ahead to anticipate practical consequences of such research activity, highlighting the steps involved in the investigative process. The intention was that the scaffolds served as referents for supporting social constructivist learning by shaping and focusing their intellectual exchanges and endeavours (McGregor, 2008) to achieve personalised learning goals. Guided by this Supporting professional learning through teacher educator enquiries 173 framework, the participants developed their individualised research design process and began to shape their researcher identity as a feature of their learning trajectory (Wenger, 1998) negotiated through participatory group experiences in a quest to define participants' researcher positionality and voice.…”
Section: The Intent Of the Social Constructivist Approach To Support mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activities and discussions provided 'scaffolding', qualitatively different from general help or assistance because it was aimed at supporting the educators in recognising what constituted an enquiry and projecting ahead to anticipate practical consequences of such research activity, highlighting the steps involved in the investigative process. The intention was that the scaffolds served as referents for supporting social constructivist learning by shaping and focusing their intellectual exchanges and endeavours (McGregor, 2008) to achieve personalised learning goals. Guided by this Downloaded by [University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries] at 02:27 27 December 2014…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the design of a GLA, the guidance could, for example, describe how teachers guide the focus of the attention of their students (McGregor 2008) and as part of the design the guiding teacher should model the behaviour he/she want their students to learn (Webb 2010). The latter includes posing questions to elaborate on argumentations or summarising the contributions of others to check whether the content of the interaction has been understood correctly.…”
Section: Engagement Related To Other Design Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%