2017
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.131.723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Temperature on Unidirectional Effect in Domain Wall Propagation

Abstract: It has been reported recently that domain wall mobility in Fe-based amorphous glass-coated microwire can be significantly different in the cases when magnetization reversal caused by domain wall motion results in different orientation of magnetization. This behaviour has been called unidirectional effect. The effect of temperature on domain wall velocity vs. axial magnetic field dependences was studied for glass-coated Fe77.5Si7.5B15 microwire samples with strong unidirectional effect. Unidirectional effect wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of eddy current damping has been claimed to be in the origin of the different mobilities due to an asymmetry effect of the conductivity of the glass-metal interface. [73,86,87] The metal-glass interface would play a significant role via the interdiffusion of metal and metalloid elements into the silicate glass structure enabled by superplasticity phenomenon during the quenching fabrication. [88] In addition, a delay in the stabilization of the inner-core diameter during the DW propagation (e.g., due to frequency and field amplitude effect) has been proposed previously, being also related with a region of negative mobility, S. In a theoretical paper, [89] the unidirectional effect or asymmetric velocity in planar DW is connected with the spin-transfer torque associated with eddy currents at the core-shell interface.…”
Section: Asymmetric Dw Mobility With the Driving Field Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of eddy current damping has been claimed to be in the origin of the different mobilities due to an asymmetry effect of the conductivity of the glass-metal interface. [73,86,87] The metal-glass interface would play a significant role via the interdiffusion of metal and metalloid elements into the silicate glass structure enabled by superplasticity phenomenon during the quenching fabrication. [88] In addition, a delay in the stabilization of the inner-core diameter during the DW propagation (e.g., due to frequency and field amplitude effect) has been proposed previously, being also related with a region of negative mobility, S. In a theoretical paper, [89] the unidirectional effect or asymmetric velocity in planar DW is connected with the spin-transfer torque associated with eddy currents at the core-shell interface.…”
Section: Asymmetric Dw Mobility With the Driving Field Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity of the propagating DWs strongly depends on the magnitude of the driving magnetic field and on the wire characteristics, including composition, dimensions, microstructure, as well as the mechanical stresses induced during preparation (intrinsic), which originate in both the rapid quenching process and in the presence of the glass coating 1518 . Externally applied mechanical stresses (extrinsic) also affect the domain wall velocity (DWV) 19,20 . Although extensively studied, the magnetic field driven DW motion in glass-coated microwires has relatively low applicability in developing logic devices, due to the difficulty of generating multiple magnetic fields on each magnetic wire segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%