1973
DOI: 10.3758/bf03212391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of texture on judgments of slant and relative distance in a picture with suggested depth

Abstract: Six surfaces from natural environments with different visual textures were photographed at angles of 60, 65, and 70 deg from perpendicular. Measurements were taken of 24 Ss' judgments of the inferred angles of slant and inferred midpoints of the six textured surfaces represented in the photographs which were viewed in the frontoparallel plane: Judgments of both slant and relative distance within the photographs were influenced by represented angle of slant and by variations in surface texture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works on slant perception using textured rectangles also demonstrated the little or modest effect of texture gradients (Saunders & Backus, 2006a; Todd & Norman, 2003; Zimmerman et al, 1995). The regular texture yielded more effect than the irregular texture, which was consistent with the previous findings showing that regular textures contain more depth information and thus contribute to the more salient, veridical perception of slant (Kraft & Winnick, 1967; Newman et al, 1973; Saunders & Backus, 2006b; Velisavljević & Elder, 2006). Grid or checkerboard textures may be more effective than the “regular” texture used in the present study, as they appear to have more information on a slant (see Anderson et al, 1998; Todd et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous works on slant perception using textured rectangles also demonstrated the little or modest effect of texture gradients (Saunders & Backus, 2006a; Todd & Norman, 2003; Zimmerman et al, 1995). The regular texture yielded more effect than the irregular texture, which was consistent with the previous findings showing that regular textures contain more depth information and thus contribute to the more salient, veridical perception of slant (Kraft & Winnick, 1967; Newman et al, 1973; Saunders & Backus, 2006b; Velisavljević & Elder, 2006). Grid or checkerboard textures may be more effective than the “regular” texture used in the present study, as they appear to have more information on a slant (see Anderson et al, 1998; Todd et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Instead of the Mahjong figure and the two-disk figure, regular and irregular textures were adopted (Figures 3B and C). Since regular textures yield more accurate slant perception (i.e., less underestimation of slant) than irregular textures (Kraft & Winnick, 1967; Newman et al, 1973; Velisavljević & Elder, 2006), it was expected that the regular texture would cause a more illusory effect. As in Experiment 1, the original surface images were 400 (W) × 560 (H) pixels in size and were stretched and pasted on the virtual square texture using 3D graphic software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research on the perception of slant, conducted mostly with computer-generated texture patterns, has typically shown underestimation (e.g., Andersen et al, 1998;Gibson, 1950b;Newman et al, 1973;Rosas et al, 2004;Saunders, 2003;Todd et al, 2005). The observers in our Experiment 2 also exhibited underestimation when they judged the surface slants by using magnitude estimation (see Figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…(Image Copyright 2001 20th Century Fox. ) required to perform judgments on an image, the phenomenal perception of inferred slant tends to be one of underestimation, which is in turn significantly affected by the surface texture of the image (Newman et al 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%