2005
DOI: 10.17221/3567-pse
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the year, fore-crops and fertilisation on yield and content of crude protein in spring barley

Abstract: In the years [2001][2002][2003] in field trials we studied the effects of the conditions of year, fore-crops (winter wheat, sugarbeet, grain maize) and optimalization of the nutritional status on the yield and crude protein content in the grain of spring barley. From the analysis of the plants we can see that dry ma�er production and nutrient concentration in the plants were influenced by the conditions of the year and the fore-crop. A�er sugar beet, the growth of the dry ma�er was intensive and the concentrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower protein content in grain of CULTANfertilized spring barley reported by Sedlář et al (2011) could be caused by tendency to lower total nitrogen concentration in aboveground biomass at the BBCH 51 growth stage (Table 2), which is in agreement with the results of Příkopa et al (2005), and higher grain retained on a 2.5 mm sieve, which complies with the findings of Qi et al (2006). Because of no significant differences in NTRg and PHNU values among all nitrogen fertilization treatments, lower grain protein content at the CULTAN treatment cannot be sufficiently explained by prolonged nitrogen uptake from soil.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Lower protein content in grain of CULTANfertilized spring barley reported by Sedlář et al (2011) could be caused by tendency to lower total nitrogen concentration in aboveground biomass at the BBCH 51 growth stage (Table 2), which is in agreement with the results of Příkopa et al (2005), and higher grain retained on a 2.5 mm sieve, which complies with the findings of Qi et al (2006). Because of no significant differences in NTRg and PHNU values among all nitrogen fertilization treatments, lower grain protein content at the CULTAN treatment cannot be sufficiently explained by prolonged nitrogen uptake from soil.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Integrating mineral nitrogen fertiliser with organic fertiliser is a promising management strategy for sustainable agricultural production systems, especially for fields with low soil organic matter contents and dry condition (Yang et al 2015;Wei et al 2016;Muller et al 2017). The effect of integrated organic-mineral fertilisation on SB yield was observed in several studies; the trails, however, show that the strength of the effect may differ depending on soil condition, weather condition in a year, and agronomical factors (Příkopa et al 2005;Váňová et al 2006;Černý et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z pohledu půdního druhu se jedná o půdy střední (ZIMOLKA, 1999). Rovněž dobrá zásoba přístup-ných živin v půdě je jedním z nezbytných předpokla-dů ovlivňující růst a vývoj sladovnického ječmene (RICHTER, RYANT, 2002;PŘÍKOPA, et al, 2005). Ječmen jarní velmi citlivě reaguje na jednotlivé pěsti-telské zásahy spolu s hnojením, a proto má v soustavě hospodaření na orné půdě specifi cké postavení.…”
unclassified