2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of thermodynamic effects on gas storage cavern convergence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where: K(t−∆t)-volumetric convergence of cavern over time t−∆t, ∆t = 1 f -delay time caused by the delaying action of the overlying rock mass. The basic component of the computational model consists of the correct definition of the initial condition in the form of volumetric convergence of a single cavern [41].…”
Section: Methods Of Surface Deformation Prediction For a Large Field Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: K(t−∆t)-volumetric convergence of cavern over time t−∆t, ∆t = 1 f -delay time caused by the delaying action of the overlying rock mass. The basic component of the computational model consists of the correct definition of the initial condition in the form of volumetric convergence of a single cavern [41].…”
Section: Methods Of Surface Deformation Prediction For a Large Field Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural gas transport and distribution networks are very well developed; therefore, the hydrogen pipeline system is directly compared to the natural gas transmission system [22]. The natural gas system consists of gas compression stations, pipelines, gas stations and gas storage facilities, including caverns [23]. The gas compression station provides the energy needed to generate gas flow at a given rate and pressure.…”
Section: Basics Of Hydrogen Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section focuses on two major issues in cavern operation: the value of the minimum gas pressure, and the cycling rate. Concerning the minimum gas pressure, choosing a value around 20% of the geostatic pressure is fairly common (Serbin et al 2015). However, lower values allow to be more economically profitable and more conservative from a cavern design perspective, even in the case of catastrophic scenarios such as blowouts during which the cavern pressure can drop quickly and remain as low as the atmospheric pressure for large amounts of time (Bérest et al 2013).…”
Section: Application To Cavern Designmentioning
confidence: 99%