1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5088(87)90565-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of zirconium on Sm(CoFeCuZr)7.2 alloys for permanent magnets I: Identification of the phases by transmission electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This R-SmCo 4 phase with c = 6.0 nm has received little attention, but its existence must be acknowledged. It is, for example, compatible with the unexplained lattice fringes having a spacing of 2.0 nm (6.0 7 3) in a high-resolution image reported by [2] for a quinary magnet alloy treated for 800 h at 850°C.…”
Section: Electron Diffractionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This R-SmCo 4 phase with c = 6.0 nm has received little attention, but its existence must be acknowledged. It is, for example, compatible with the unexplained lattice fringes having a spacing of 2.0 nm (6.0 7 3) in a high-resolution image reported by [2] for a quinary magnet alloy treated for 800 h at 850°C.…”
Section: Electron Diffractionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The compounds have a common sublattice, namely that of hexagonal SmCo 5 with which the strong diffraction maxima are shared. Essentially two different orientations in electron diffraction, together with high-resolution imaging, have allowed the positive identification of 1 : 3, 2 : 7, and 5 : 19, as shown convincingly in the work of [2]. There a cast magnet studied was Sm(Co 0.69 Fe 0.22 Cu 0.06 Zr 0.03 ) 7.2 (a formula given in magnetician's nomenclature which assumes that Zr replaces Co), or in at.%, 12.20 Sm, 2.63 Zr, 19.32 Fe, 60.59 Co, 5.27 Cu.…”
Section: Previous Work On 2 : 17 Magnet Alloysmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations