2009
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influences of forest stand management on biotic and abiotic risks of damage

Abstract: Abstract• This article synthesizes and reviews the available information on the effects of forestry practices on the occurrence of biotic and abiotic hazards, as well as on stand susceptibility to these damaging agents, concentrating on mammal herbivores, pest insects, pathogenic fungi, wind and fire.• The management operations examined are site selection, site preparation, stand composition, regeneration method, cleaning and weed control, thinning and pruning, and harvesting. For each of these operations we h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
167
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(188 reference statements)
4
167
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although various policy documents were supporting wider use of CCF in planted forests in Britain by the late 1990s [9], recent analysis indicates that uptake of this approach is still limited and is mainly confined to forests where aspects such as recreation, amenity and biodiversity are high on the list of objectives [19,20]. Nevertheless, recent concerns about the potential vulnerability of single species plantations to the impacts of climate change [13] or to the spread of pests and diseases [90] raises the question as to whether CCF can be considered as a more resilient approach for management of planted forests. For the purposes of this discussion, it is assumed that the decision to use an alternative approach such as CCF depends as much upon its technical feasibility as its theoretical ability to deliver a range of ecosystem services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various policy documents were supporting wider use of CCF in planted forests in Britain by the late 1990s [9], recent analysis indicates that uptake of this approach is still limited and is mainly confined to forests where aspects such as recreation, amenity and biodiversity are high on the list of objectives [19,20]. Nevertheless, recent concerns about the potential vulnerability of single species plantations to the impacts of climate change [13] or to the spread of pests and diseases [90] raises the question as to whether CCF can be considered as a more resilient approach for management of planted forests. For the purposes of this discussion, it is assumed that the decision to use an alternative approach such as CCF depends as much upon its technical feasibility as its theoretical ability to deliver a range of ecosystem services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, severe defoliation caused by insect pests can have a considerable impact on the forestry sector by reducing tree growth and timber quality leading to an economic loss of woody products (Jactel et al 2009;Dale et al 2001;Långström et al 2001). Heavy mass outbreaks can have the potential to alter natural forested landscapes and habitat structure by extinguishing tree species and associated fauna and flora (Parmesan and Yohe 2003;Brändle and Brandl 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest management, manipulating the latter aspects, significantly affects the susceptibility to insect pests (e.g., Veteli et al, 2006;Fajvan et al, 2008;Jactel et al, 2009). The potential influence of vegetation attributes is best illustrated by tree-based classifications according to a set of discriminating variables, often including stand basal area or specific tree properties (Reynolds and Holsten, 1996;Negrón and Popp, 2004).…”
Section: Insectsmentioning
confidence: 99%