2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1246142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Information Content of Implied Volatility: Evidence from Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the hypothesis stating that there is a negative relationship between contemporaneous returns of the underlying stocks index and implied volatility variations (H3), we expect a significant and negative value of the coefficient as evidenced by several studies as Fleming et al (1995); Whaley (2000); Frijns et al (2010);Ryu (2012) among others. In addition, considering the absolute value of contemporary daily returns from the underlying stock index allows us to highlight the existence of an asymmetrical relationship between implied volatility variations and current returns from underlying stocks indices.…”
Section: Implied Volatility Indices and The Underlying Stock Returnsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To validate the hypothesis stating that there is a negative relationship between contemporaneous returns of the underlying stocks index and implied volatility variations (H3), we expect a significant and negative value of the coefficient as evidenced by several studies as Fleming et al (1995); Whaley (2000); Frijns et al (2010);Ryu (2012) among others. In addition, considering the absolute value of contemporary daily returns from the underlying stock index allows us to highlight the existence of an asymmetrical relationship between implied volatility variations and current returns from underlying stocks indices.…”
Section: Implied Volatility Indices and The Underlying Stock Returnsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Similarly, it contains all the information regarding the future volatility that is not included in the historical volatility. More recently, Frijns et al (2010) examined the performance of the information content of the implied volatility index AVX calculated from options market prices from the Australian stock index S & P / ASX 200, compared to alternative models for volatility forecasting (the GARCH models and "RiskMetrics" approach) for various forecast horizons. Thus, in sample empirical results showed that implied volatility index contains additional information with respect to the model GJR-GARCH (1,1).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VIX, the most well-known volatility index of the US market, plays a successful role as a market indicator and fear gauge measure. Numerous articles that examine the fitting and forecasting ability of the US' implied volatility index demonstrate its superiority over historical volatilities (Banerjee et al, 2007;Becker et al, 2007;Carr and Wu, 2006;Corrado and Miller, 2005;Frijns et al, 2010;Jiang and Tian, 2007;Konstantinidi et al, 2008;Simon, 2003). Some studies also investigate implied volatility indices for quantifying market risk and for risk management purposes (Giot, 2005;Kim and Ryu, 2015b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they observe that the information extracted from S&P 500 index options and the information recovered from VIX options significantly improve all the prediction on the S&P 500 index. The studies of Frijns et al (2010) and Dowling and Muthuswamy (2005) on the Australian stock market based on implied volatility index show that the implied volatility indices contain information about both stock market return and future volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%