2000
DOI: 10.1086/308359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Initial Mass Function of the Galactic Bulge down to ∼0.15M

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
160
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
36
160
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies of the IMF by Kroupa et al (1993) and Zoccali et al (2000) support this IMF. Alternatively, we also consider the IMF of Scalo (1986, S86),…”
Section: Binary Population Synthesismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The studies of the IMF by Kroupa et al (1993) and Zoccali et al (2000) support this IMF. Alternatively, we also consider the IMF of Scalo (1986, S86),…”
Section: Binary Population Synthesismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This IMF is based on Salpeter's mass function for the more massive stars (Salpeter 1955); i.e., dN=dM / m À with ¼ À2:35. For lower masses, the IMF is flatter, as determined from bulge star counts at 6 projected distance from the GC (Zoccali et al 2000; exponent À2.0 for 1 M > M > 0:7M and À1.65 for M < 0:7M ). For the lowest masses, there is a correction to the exponent due to binaries (Miralda-Escudé & Gould 2000).…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For instance, an index α = 1.35 would produce ∼20% less events. A flat mass function at the low mass end seems to be favored by the luminosity function towards the Bulge (Holtzman et al 1998;Zoccali et al 2000). However there remains uncertainties in the binaries fraction, and also a flat mass function would be in conflict with the distribution of time-scales of observed microlensing events towards the Galactic Centre.…”
Section: Lens Mass Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%