The Injury Determination Category and the Value of Relief from Dumping

Heterogeneous firm-level responses to trade liberalization: A test using stock price reactions

“…Second, the export incidence among Canadian manufacturing …rms was much lower in 1988 than nowadays, implying a substantial number of non-exporters even among larger manufacturing …rms. 24 Third, and most importantly, the most probable e¤ect of any remaining sample bias will be to make it less likely to observe statistically signi…cant di¤erences in stock market returns between small and large …rms in response to news about CUSFTA. To see this, note that the sample bias towards larger …rms implies that even the smaller …rms in my sample are relatively large compared to the average Canadian manufacturing …rm.…”

An Econometric Analysis of U.S. Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions

“…3 Finger et al (1982) provided the first empirical study of U.S. antidumping actions. Anderson (1993), Baldwin (1985), Moore (1992), Devault (1993), Hansen (1990), Hansen andPrusa (1996, 1997), Hartigan et al (1989), Herander and Schwartz (1984) all looked at the determinants of ITC decisions over many different time periods.…”

Did US Safeguard Protection on Steel Affect Market Power of European Steel Producers?

“…The first column describes the number of affected firms in the Roeger specification. Our dataset consists of over two thirds of single-product firms that on average exhibit a bit lower degree of competition for their products than multi-product firms 21 . Regarding the structure of the industry, only 19 percent of multi-product firms are active in directly affected industry of basic metals.…”