1998
DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.12.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Instability of Authorship: Credit and Responsibility in Contemporary Biomedicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
59
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These problems are particularly felt in biomedical research, because of the great importance attached to ethical integrity and responsibility attribution in that field (Biagioli, 1998). As a consequence, since 1985, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has published and updated the 'Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals'.…”
Section: The Vexed Issue Of Authorshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems are particularly felt in biomedical research, because of the great importance attached to ethical integrity and responsibility attribution in that field (Biagioli, 1998). As a consequence, since 1985, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has published and updated the 'Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals'.…”
Section: The Vexed Issue Of Authorshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La responsabilidad y la verdad son absolutas, por eso hay que definir la autoría de los trabajos científicos en tér-minos estrictamente individuales (Biagioli, 1998). A pesar de las pruebas sobre malas prácticas de autoría y a pesar de la necesidad de su regulación, los estudios deben ser ahora más ambiciosos, pues la complejidad de las relaciones entre autoría, responsabilidad y crédito radica, según YegrosYegros, en las tensiones entre la economía de la ciencia y la economía de mercado.…”
Section: Número Máximo De Autores Orden De Firma Y Responsable De Counclassified
“…By contrast, in heavily multiauthored clinical trials or large genome-wide association studies, for example, coauthorship may simply reflect a modest (but probably important) cocontributor role; yet, equivalent citation weight is allotted these "minor" authors, a flaw I term the equivalent contribution bias. The challenges of assigning authorship credit are not insubstantial, as recently reviewed by Biagioli, 15 whose careful analysis further weakens the assumption of author equivalence on which these bibliometric indices are based.…”
Section: Article See P 1038mentioning
confidence: 99%