2018
DOI: 10.18500/1818-9601-2018-18-1-82-86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Institution of Direct Presidential Elections in Parliamentary Republics

Abstract: В статье анализируется влияние института прямых выборов президента на форму правления в условиях парламентской республики. Автор выделяет пять моделей итога введения всенародных выборов, из которых в трех моделях (Исландия, Ирландия и Чешская Республика) сохраняется парламентская система, а в двух других происходит переход к полупрезидентской (Франция) и президентской системам (Турция). Дается авторская оценка роли всенародных выборов президента в парламентской системе. Ключевые слова: выборы президента, прямы… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper will examine the models and institutional mechanisms for the controlled transfer of power of the head of state in presidential systems. The scope of this paper did not allow us to include in the study the transfer of presidential power in parliamentary systems [3]. We only note that there the question of a controlled transfer of power is most often resolved through non-public intra-party mechanisms, and, therefore, is specific in comparison with presidential systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This paper will examine the models and institutional mechanisms for the controlled transfer of power of the head of state in presidential systems. The scope of this paper did not allow us to include in the study the transfer of presidential power in parliamentary systems [3]. We only note that there the question of a controlled transfer of power is most often resolved through non-public intra-party mechanisms, and, therefore, is specific in comparison with presidential systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%