2008
DOI: 10.1787/hemp-v20-art22-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The institutional organisation of knowledge transfer and its implications

Abstract: How do European universities organise the knowledge transfer (KT) task? We consider the institutional organisation of knowledge transfer as encompassing 1) the knowledge transfer office structure, i.e. the way universities have embedded and organise their KT activities, 2) the focus towards the KT task, linked to the KT strategy, and 3) the KT activities themselves. Four exploratory cases of European universities show various motives to perform the KT task, different KT strategies and distinct interpretations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous paper (Van der Heide et al, 2008) we have discussed the different configurations of the knowledge transfer (KT) function at four European universities. The knowledge transfer activities we distinguish are: patents and licensing, university-industry networks, spin-off and enterprise creation, continuous professional development (CPD), international cooperation, European affairs, grants, national and regional subsidies, alumni affairs.…”
Section: Extended Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous paper (Van der Heide et al, 2008) we have discussed the different configurations of the knowledge transfer (KT) function at four European universities. The knowledge transfer activities we distinguish are: patents and licensing, university-industry networks, spin-off and enterprise creation, continuous professional development (CPD), international cooperation, European affairs, grants, national and regional subsidies, alumni affairs.…”
Section: Extended Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%