2019
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inter‐rater and test‐retest reliability of skin thickness and skin elasticity measurements by the DermaLab Combo in healthy participants

Abstract: BackgroundFor several purposes, skin parameters like thickness and elasticity can be measured. However, little is known about the accuracy of those measurements.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the intrarater and test‐retest reliability of skin thickness and elasticity measurements performed with the DermaLab Combo®.MethodsA total of 49 participants were included in this study. Skin thickness and elasticity were measured at six defined locations on the dominant arm. Measurements were repeated two time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognizing that it may not be possible to use the values from one cheek to replace another, previous studies have included a rest period of 45 minutes between repeated measurements in order to avoid consequences of hysteresis. 24 Further, repeated measurements, up to three times, 25 would provide a mean score and potentially accommodate out of range or missing values. Future work should incorporate these methods to reduce missing data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recognizing that it may not be possible to use the values from one cheek to replace another, previous studies have included a rest period of 45 minutes between repeated measurements in order to avoid consequences of hysteresis. 24 Further, repeated measurements, up to three times, 25 would provide a mean score and potentially accommodate out of range or missing values. Future work should incorporate these methods to reduce missing data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test-re-rest reliability of skin elasticity measurements while avoiding cofounding has been described in a previous study. 24 Given this information, a potential solution would be to perform baseline measurements of cheek skin elasticity on both cheeks, such that any measurement out of range can be performed on the other cheek without hindering the statistical significance of the results. Recognizing that it may not be possible to use the values from one cheek to replace another, previous studies have included a rest period of 45 minutes between repeated measurements in order to avoid consequences of hysteresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the reference values of all reliable tests require age‐specific adjustments, as the photoaging process in women affects the skin function and ultrastructure 13 . In our study, we have used the multi‐parameter skin analysis system Dermalab Combo SkinLab, and reliability of which has been tested in different trials 18‐20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evaluates skin elasticity and hardness, [10][11][12][13] ultrasound elastography uses Young's modulus to describe tissue stiffness, 5,[14][15][16][17][18][19] DermaLab/ DermaLab Combo define elastic properties, [20][21][22][23][24][25] SkinFibrometer measures skin induration 5,[26][27][28][29] and most commonly used Cutometer measures skin elastic and viscoelastic properties. 5,7,10,26,[30][31][32][33][34] Suction methods are one of the most widely used in basic and in applied skin research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%