1956
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1956.9713009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interaction Chronograph as an Instrument for Objective Measurement of Interaction Patterns During Interviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In answering this question, we initially employed Chapple's Interaction Chronograph and the ten speech variables that it generated (Matarazzo et al, 1956). However, a subsequent factor analysis (Matarazzo, Saslow, & Hare, 1958) revealed that many of these ten variables were redundant, and that two variables (speech and silence durations), and possibly a third (a speaker's interruption of his partner or similar "maladjustment" in synchrony), more than adequately recorded what previously had required ten separate measures.…”
Section: Description Of the Scoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In answering this question, we initially employed Chapple's Interaction Chronograph and the ten speech variables that it generated (Matarazzo et al, 1956). However, a subsequent factor analysis (Matarazzo, Saslow, & Hare, 1958) revealed that many of these ten variables were redundant, and that two variables (speech and silence durations), and possibly a third (a speaker's interruption of his partner or similar "maladjustment" in synchrony), more than adequately recorded what previously had required ten separate measures.…”
Section: Description Of the Scoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the study of talk and silence patterns in monologues and dialogues has had a long history, stretching back to the work of Chapple (1940), only a few researchers have had the technology necessary to contribute to this history. Since Chapple's comprehensive program, studies by Matarazzo and his associates (Matarazzo, Saslow, & Matarazzo, 1956;Matarazzo, Weitman, Saslow, & Wiens, 1963), Goldman-Eisler (1968), and Jaffe and Feldstein (1 970) have rekindled interest in and advanced the study of talk and silence patterns. The foci of these studies center on three concerns: (1) consistency or reliability of talk and silence parameters, (2) factors which can modify observed consistencies, and (3) representation of the sequential character of talk and silence patterns.…”
Section: Previous Literature On Talk and Silence Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent research in more controlled interview settings (Matarazzo, Weitman, Saslow, & Wiens, 1963) shows that interviewers can induce and extinguish longer and shorter durations of single speech units in interviewees simply by increasing or decreasing the length of their own speech durations. Similar influence by interviewers on interviewees has beenobserved for latency times (i.e., switching pauses; Matarazzo & Wiens, 1967) and for speech rate (measured as the number of syllables divided by phonation time; Webb, 1972).…”
Section: Partner Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few attempts at programmatic research have relied on various types of technological aids to assist in the recording and analysis of talk and silence activity (Cassotta, Jaffe, & Feldstein, 1964;Chapple, 1949;Matarazzo, Saslow, & Saslow, 1956). The most sophisticated of these was developed and implemented by Jaffe and Feldstein (1970) and their associates (Welkowitz & Martz,Note 2) and is currently operating in the departments of psychology at New York University and the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.…”
Section: Theory and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%