1998
DOI: 10.1016/s8755-4615(98)90050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interdependency of fair use and the first amendment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patterson (1987) examined this relationship and its complexity in his challenging but well-considered work "Free Speech, Copyright, and Fair Use" using complex historical and legal analysis to argue that the Constitution's intellectual property clause also incorporates free-speech constraints. (I also argued in an earlier work [Herrington, 1998] that fair use and free speech have a correlative relationship in the framework of constitutional and statutory goals, and I still find this argument supportable.) But the relationship among free speech, the constitutional intellectual property provision, copyright, and fair use has become much more complex as a result of the Supreme Court's response to a 2003 case, Eldred v. Ashcroft, that created a new structure for understanding the balance provided in the Constitution's intellectual property clause.…”
Section: The Role Of Copyright and Free Speech In Democracymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Patterson (1987) examined this relationship and its complexity in his challenging but well-considered work "Free Speech, Copyright, and Fair Use" using complex historical and legal analysis to argue that the Constitution's intellectual property clause also incorporates free-speech constraints. (I also argued in an earlier work [Herrington, 1998] that fair use and free speech have a correlative relationship in the framework of constitutional and statutory goals, and I still find this argument supportable.) But the relationship among free speech, the constitutional intellectual property provision, copyright, and fair use has become much more complex as a result of the Supreme Court's response to a 2003 case, Eldred v. Ashcroft, that created a new structure for understanding the balance provided in the Constitution's intellectual property clause.…”
Section: The Role Of Copyright and Free Speech In Democracymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is obvious, but yet scholars have needed to defend fair use and elaborate its importance to scholarship and the progressive culture of information sharing found in university research (Crews, 1993; Frazier, 1999), and more broadly defend the constitutional basis for the public domain of ideas (Benkler, 2003). Fair use is also closely tied to free speech (Burk, 2001), and the two are interrelated to scholarship (Herrington, 1998), as scholars must be free to make unpopular statements. Furthermore, the ties between free speech and democracy are well‐established (Litman, 1999; Pfaffenberger, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%