2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The intermediate dispersal principle in spatially explicit metapopulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible examples include directly transmitted human diseases (i.e., pathologies that are transmitted through airborne or fecal-oral contact), in which the intertwining of mobility and social networks may play a key role in spreading the epidemic, and vector-borne/zoonotic diseases, in which spatial interactions of both host and vector/carrier populations might be relevant. In general, the mathematical framework outlined in this work can be used to approach other (apparently unrelated) topics in spatial and conservation ecology, such as the persistence of populations living in fragmented landscapes (e.g., Casagrandi and Gatto 1999Gatto , 2002Gatto , 2006, advective environments (e.g., Speirs and Gurney 2001;Pachepsky et al 2005), dendritic networks (Campbell Grant et al 2007, and webs of marine protected areas (e.g., White et al 2010;Aiken and Navarrete 2011;Watson et al 2011). In all these cases, in fact, population persistence can be established by properly accounting for the relevant spatial interactions and studying the conditions under which the extinction equilibrium becomes stable or unstable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible examples include directly transmitted human diseases (i.e., pathologies that are transmitted through airborne or fecal-oral contact), in which the intertwining of mobility and social networks may play a key role in spreading the epidemic, and vector-borne/zoonotic diseases, in which spatial interactions of both host and vector/carrier populations might be relevant. In general, the mathematical framework outlined in this work can be used to approach other (apparently unrelated) topics in spatial and conservation ecology, such as the persistence of populations living in fragmented landscapes (e.g., Casagrandi and Gatto 1999Gatto , 2002Gatto , 2006, advective environments (e.g., Speirs and Gurney 2001;Pachepsky et al 2005), dendritic networks (Campbell Grant et al 2007, and webs of marine protected areas (e.g., White et al 2010;Aiken and Navarrete 2011;Watson et al 2011). In all these cases, in fact, population persistence can be established by properly accounting for the relevant spatial interactions and studying the conditions under which the extinction equilibrium becomes stable or unstable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, dispersal may help species escape local catastrophes [7]; on the other hand, dispersal of common species may endanger rarer ones by 'stepping over' their geographical distributions, and limited dispersal favours divergence among allopatric populations. From a more applied viewpoint, understanding why certain species or genotypes disperse more than others might help to understand shifts in species distributions because of global change [8], to understand constraints on the adaptation of species to changing environmental conditions [9], to plan conservation strategies for threatened species or communities [10,11] and to design strategies for the management of invasive species [12] that build upon our knowledge of their evolutionary histories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good reference to find the underlying mathematical theory is the textbook by Allen (2003) and its references. As examples of recent applications of continuous-time Markov chains in population biology, we mention some papers published in this journal (Casagrandi and Gatto, 2006;Fouchet et al, 2008;Stirk et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%