2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EU has strongly supported the protection of GIs at the international level, and there is optimism about the effects of GIs on trade values and quantities (see De Filippis et al, 2022, for a systematic literature review of GIs trade effects). The existing literature has mainly evaluated the impacts of GIs on export/import activities (Altomonte et al, 2013; Curzi & Huysman, 2022; Fernandez‐Olmos & Diez‐Vial, 2014) and participation in GVCs (Mancini, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EU has strongly supported the protection of GIs at the international level, and there is optimism about the effects of GIs on trade values and quantities (see De Filippis et al, 2022, for a systematic literature review of GIs trade effects). The existing literature has mainly evaluated the impacts of GIs on export/import activities (Altomonte et al, 2013; Curzi & Huysman, 2022; Fernandez‐Olmos & Diez‐Vial, 2014) and participation in GVCs (Mancini, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Compared to standard agri-food productions, GIs can generate socio-economic benefits at both producer and territorial levels, which have been documented in the literature (on GIs' economic effects: Cei et al, 2018;Crescenzi, De Filippis, et al, 2022;FAO, 2021). GIs have assumed a crucial role also in the EU trade economy, becoming a contentious issue in trade negotiations (De Filippis et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographical origin separates products from their conventional counterparts and protects them from fraud and unfair competition. Geographical origin is a difficult-toreproduce trait considered a quality cue (De Filippis et al, 2022). 2) Price the price will go up even more.…”
Section: Section 5: the Potential For Geographical Indications To Inc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By linking food quality and reputation to a specific territory (Torok et al., 2020), compared to standard agri‐food productions, GIs indeed operate as a place‐branding strategy capable of generating substantial socio‐economic spillovers, enhancing producers' and territorial welfare (Merel et al., 2021). GIs generate several benefits evidenced in the literature: premium pricing (Menapace & Moschini, 2012), farmers' income (Hughes, 2009), consumers' preferences (Menapace et al., 2011), trade (de Filippis et al., 2022), local development (Crescenzi et al., 2022) and sustainability (Gocci & Luetge, 2011). In global markets, the literature demonstrates that obtaining a GI avoids misleading labelling, confers greater consumer trust in the authenticity of products (Deselnicu et al., 2013; Menapace et al., 2011), and attracts foreign direct investment (Crescenzi et al., 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study falls within the latter group of studies, which are briefly reviewed here. Despite some heterogeneity (Chilla et al, 2020;Marette et al, 2008;Sorgho & Larue, 2018), a meta-analysis conducted by de Filippis et al (2022) demonstrated that there is substantial consensus on the trade-enhancing effect of GIs in terms of premium pricing (among others, Brooks, 2003;Raimondi et al, 2020), export values (Agostino & Trivieri, 2014;Torok & Jambor, 2016) and volumes (Sorgho & Larue, 2014). Focusing on wines produced in Italy, France and Spain, Agostino and Trivieri (2014) found a positive effect on extensive margins (i.e., new trade routes), especially in the case of high-income destination markets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%