2018
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay between chemical speciation and physiology determines the bioaccumulation and toxicity of Cu(II) and Cd(II) to Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract: Using the well-documented model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, a combined analysis of metal speciation in the exposure medium and body burdens of metals (Zn, Cu and Cd) was performed, and factors that are predictive of toxicological endpoints in single metal and mixed metal exposures were identified. Cu, and to a lesser extent Cd, is found to associate with Escherichia coli in the exposure medium (the food source for C. elegans) as evidenced by the observed decrease in both their dissolved and free metal ion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we tested whether reduced bacterial Cu-efflux capacity improved the aforementioned C. elegans Cu-toxicity endpoints by reducing the overall quantity, or internal dose, of Cu in C. elegans following the same 48 h exposure to 100 μM Cu since increases in measured Cu-body burden are consistent indicators of excess metal concentration in the environment and are predictive of dose-dependent toxicity ( 40 ). To quantify the C. elegans Cu-body burden, nematodes were collected after the limited 48 h exposure ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we tested whether reduced bacterial Cu-efflux capacity improved the aforementioned C. elegans Cu-toxicity endpoints by reducing the overall quantity, or internal dose, of Cu in C. elegans following the same 48 h exposure to 100 μM Cu since increases in measured Cu-body burden are consistent indicators of excess metal concentration in the environment and are predictive of dose-dependent toxicity ( 40 ). To quantify the C. elegans Cu-body burden, nematodes were collected after the limited 48 h exposure ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal or silencing of Cu-homeostatic elements reduces Cu-body burden in nematodes while increasing the severity of Cu-toxicity endpoints at higher concentration of environmental Cu (31,32). Without genetic silencing of Cu homeostatic elements in nematodes, the free water-borne fraction of Cu in the environment was shown J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f to be the most significant contributor to the Cu-body burden and subsequent toxicity in conditions of Cu excess (33,40). While the potential role for bacterially-associated Cu is recognized, the impact was considered minimally additive to the body-burden and toxicity of free water-borne exposures (35,38).…”
Section: Disconnecting Dose-dependent Toxicity In the Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that the accumulation effects of heavy metals will aggravate the exposure doses and harm of metals in the organisms, we combined the nematode model and further searched for the LC50 exposure experiments of the Cu 2+ and Cd 2+ to C. elegans in the literatures at home and abroad. It was found that the growth and metabolism were significantly inhibited when both metal exposures reached 10 μg/mL and stimulated oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation occurred (Moyson et al, 2019). Therefore, 10 μg/mL was selected as the exposure dose for Cu 2+ /Cd 2+ to induce nematode damage in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk assessments, even by modern legislations such as Regulation for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), are usually performed on single metal exposure and thus fully ignore the mixture effects (Backhaus & Faust, 2012 ). Furthermore, it is well established that the combination of different chemicals can produce significant toxic effects, even though they may cause no or very limited observable effects when applied individually (Moyson, Town, Joosen, Husson, & Blust, 2019 ). There is thus a need to understand how metals act together in mixtures and how these should be handled in a regulatory risk assessment context (Backhaus & Faust, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%