The interplay between formal and informal elements in analysing situations of role conflict among construction participants

Abstract

The interplay between formal and informal elements in analysing situations of role conflict among construction participants The interplay of formal and informal factors in construction teams influences the enactment of roles and the individuals who fulfil those roles. With a specific focus on a phenomenon called role conflict, the aim is to explore if and how the interaction of formal and informal elements would lead to situations of role conflict. This phenomenon proved to lead to frustration, tension and employee burnout. An analytical model of role interaction was developed, which disentangles formal and informal elements that shape role interactions. Qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews, project documents and observations. Four cases of role conflict are presented here. Contract, as a formal element, and participant's values and interests, as informal elements, appeared to be the most important factor shaping participants' expectations and behaviours. The analysis in this study showed that if a participant who faces role conflict is able to influence the formal elements in favour of his or her informal elements, then he or she may experience less frustration. At a more general level, the results suggest that increasing formality can increase participants' frustration, which then would decrease the likelihood of collaboration. As the theoretical contribution, this research extends organisational role theory to deal with informal and formal aspects. Taking into account formal sources enables the study of how roles are institutionally governed while including informal sources allows for the idea that some of the aspects of the role, even in the context of work role, are socially constructed.

Role Stress, Job Burnout, and Job Performance in Construction Project Managers: The Moderating Role of Career Calling

“…Roles in construction projects are diverse and include a wide range of issues which come about. Some of these issues come about because of the way the market operates, some because of the need for governance, while some have become institutionalized [58]. As construction tasks continue to evolve and become more complex, role stress becomes more complicated and tends to have a negative impact on work commitments.…”

Contextual Communicative Competence in Multinational Infrastructure Projects

“…It includes three aspects; the knowledge of a language (competence), the ability to create meaning in a language (capacity), and the actual use of a language in practical situations (performance) [21]. Although there are recent studies regarding multidisciplinary teams in construction (e.g., [22]), communication in construction (e.g., [23]), and new roles in construction (e.g., [24,25]), there seems to be a need for more studies on inter-organizational communication challenges and competence needs in a multinational project context, like that of the STA and its international contractors. Given the call from Koch et al [26] and Volker [27] for more interdisciplinary research in construction management, and by exploring empirical data from contemporary construction projects through theories on relational contracting, language use, and culture, we contribute to bridging a gap in the construction management literature.…”

Response of contractor behavior to hierarchical governance: effects on the performance of mega-projects

“…Our results echo the argument by Oedzes et al (2019) that informal HG has a weaker relationship with contractor behavior. Informal HG between general contractors and subcontractors is vulnerable to external complexity (Brahm and Tarzij an, 2015;Kabiri and Hughes, 2018), which rarely stimulates interactions between contractors and owners.…”