The Interplay between Social and Environmental Degradation in the Development of the International Political Economy*

Abstract

This article considers capitalism as a dissipative system, developing at the expense of exporting disorder into two sorts of ‘environment’: the physical ecosystem; and a subordinate area of society which serves to nourish mainstream order without experiencing its benefits. Particularly significant is the relationship between the two forms of dissipation. The paper begins by assessing the dangers of translating systems theory into social relations, concluding that the project is nevertheless worthwhile, provided that exploitation and struggle are constantly borne in mind. Exploring the concepts of ‘core’ and ‘periphery,’ the paper highlights the contradictory nature of an attribute of chaos which is both ascribed to the out-group, and also really exported to it. If the core’s growth merely destroyed peripheral order, the entropy of capitalism would be starkly exposed in the form of an exhaustion of future room for maneuver. This problem can be kept at bay by maintaining a self-reproducing ‘low’ order within the subordinate social system; however the fundamental entropy is still there, and will sooner or later manifest itself in the shape of threats to the sustainability of that subordinate system. At the level of the international political economy (IPE), this dialectic unfolds against the background of a ‘lumpy’ development whereby (following structural crises) order can be reconstituted, but at a cost which must be absorbed somewhere. In the case of the post-World War II reordering, this cost was massively exported to the physical environment. Since a high level of ecological depletion now appears permanently embedded within the capitalist IPE, future major efforts of order-building cannot rely on this dimension to the same degree, and must instead access some new forms of dissipative relationship with the social environment. The paper argues that this is the fundamental significance of the ‘sustainable development’ discourse: it brings together the physical and social environments into a single approach, where substitution between one and the other can be experimented. To some extent, the social environment can be treated as ‘fuel,’ and contemporary management sys-tems are noteworthy for exploring the access to an added value through the self-exploitation of small producers, realized through emergent process such as production chains. But ultimately, the ‘fuel’ definition cannot be separated from the other definition of dissipa-tion, the export of disorder; and this must be managed somehow. The dominant interests respond by means of social engineering in the periphery, for example by pushing the sustainability notion in the direction of social development theories like ‘sustainable livelihoods.’ Most immediately the problem appears in the form of purely negative phenomena: namely unmanageable levels of poverty and conflict. But there is another issue, even more threatening to the capitalist order, but hopeful for those critical of it: the increasing likelihood of unco-opted forms of emergent social order.

Redesigning Money to Curb Globalization: Can We Domesticate the Root of All Evil?

“…The problematic relationship between general-purpose money and thermodynamics inexorably also generates unequal exchange in the sense of objectively asymmetric transfers of biophysical resources from extractive sectors to core regions of the world-system. The societal implications of these material polarizations, asymmetries, and inequalities have been conceptualized in trans-disciplinary theory unraveling the connections between thermodynamics and political economy (Bunker 1985;Hornborg 1992Hornborg , 2001aBiel 2006Biel , 2012). The uneven accumulation of technological infrastructure in core sectors of the worldsystem has been made possible by the interaction of money, prices, and the exchange of for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 266800 This project has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 266800 biophysical resources over the past three centuries.…”

Influence of Superimposed Capitalism on Traditional Natural Resource Utilization Systems

“…Compared with the effects of cattle framing on ecosystem, this is more harmful to the diversity of wild animal species such as reptile and amphibian species. Most importantly, such illegal forest utilization practices occurred in 'profit ordinated' superimposed capitalist social system is more harmful to the natural environment compared with forest utilization practices in a traditional feudal social system (Biel, 2015;Kumara, 2016). .…”

Fairtrade, Food Security and Globalization: Building Alternative Food Systems

“…Por último, proponiendo una idea de justicia social y ambiental que puede ser alcanzada a través del "consumo ético", fairtrade no logra criticar el sobreconsumo excesivo y la ilusión de un crecimiento económico sin fin, que son las principales causas de la entropía social y ambiental generada por el capitalismo globalizado (Biel 2006). Por lo tanto, fairtrade no presenta una crítica sustancial de las visiones hegemónicas del "desarrollo" ni de las profundas contradicciones del capitalismo (Shreck 2005).…”