2015
DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay between sulfur and iron nutrition in tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
72
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
17
72
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, the remobilization of these pools has been tackled using sprays with acidic solutions aimed to lower the pH (Tagliavini et al, 1995Rombolà et al, 2000;Tagliavini and Rombolà , 2001;Abadía et al, 2004;Á lvarez-Ferná ndez et al, 2004, and references therein) as well as containing different carboxylates (Tagliavini et al, 1995Rombolà et al, 2000;Á lvarez-Ferná ndez et al, 2004), but our data support that the use of reducing compounds such as GSH can be a more efficient way of remediating or preventing Fe chlorosis in crops. Results also contribute to the growing evidence that the interplay between S and Fe in plants is relevant (Gayomba et al, 2015;Zuchi et al, 2015;Zamboni et al, 2017). Further studies should be aimed to test formulations incorporating reducing compounds such as GSH, especially in high value fruit crops heavily affected by Fe chlorosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Until now, the remobilization of these pools has been tackled using sprays with acidic solutions aimed to lower the pH (Tagliavini et al, 1995Rombolà et al, 2000;Tagliavini and Rombolà , 2001;Abadía et al, 2004;Á lvarez-Ferná ndez et al, 2004, and references therein) as well as containing different carboxylates (Tagliavini et al, 1995Rombolà et al, 2000;Á lvarez-Ferná ndez et al, 2004), but our data support that the use of reducing compounds such as GSH can be a more efficient way of remediating or preventing Fe chlorosis in crops. Results also contribute to the growing evidence that the interplay between S and Fe in plants is relevant (Gayomba et al, 2015;Zuchi et al, 2015;Zamboni et al, 2017). Further studies should be aimed to test formulations incorporating reducing compounds such as GSH, especially in high value fruit crops heavily affected by Fe chlorosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Interactions occur among the homeostatic controls of various nutrients in plants (Forieri et al, 2013;Briat et al, 2015b;Zuchi et al, 2015). However, the molecular crosstalk between Mo and Fe homeostases has been little investigated and evidence for its existence is mostly circumstantial (Bittner, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together a lack of APR and SIR should result in lower levels of reduced S compounds including glutathione. Lack of reduced S compounds should cause up-regulation of plant sulfate uptake, which explains the higher S content after Fe deficiency (Koprivova and Kopriva, 2014); indeed, Fe deficiency was shown to increase S uptake capacity in tomato and wheat (Ciaffi et al, 2013;Zuchi et al, 2015) In plant shoots, micronutrient economy, the idea that certain proteins under deficiency are preferred targets for down-regulation to benefit cofactor delivery to other essential functions, is documented for Cu (Burkhead et al, 2009) and Zn . The down-regulation at the transcript level of abundant Fe proteins, coordinated with the SUFB key factor of the Fe-S assembly system, should help to safely economize and perhaps prioritize Fe during Fe deficiency.…”
Section: Effects Of Fe Deficiency On Plastid Fe-s Assembly and S Metamentioning
confidence: 99%