“…This sometimes takes the form of a multiple-choice task, where the set of choices is supplied as a list of potential antecedents after the test sentence (e.g., Hirakawa, 1990;Thomas, 1989Thomas, , 1991, or the form of a picture-identification task, with 2 or more pictures illustrating potential interpretations of a particular sentence (e.g., Bennett, 1994;Eckman, 1994;Finer, 1991;Finer & Broselow, 1986). However, such tasks may only elicit preferences on the part of those being tested (Hirakawa, 1990;Lakshmanan & Teranishi, 1994;Thomas, 1989Thomas, , 1991Wakabayashi, 1996), even when the researchers attempt to train people about potential ambiguity (Bennett, 1994;Thomas, 1991). In the case of sentences like (1), English NSs usually assume that the sentence's subject is the antecedent of the reflexive; they will recognize the object interpretation if it is pointed out to them or if the context favours it.…”