The Interpretive Turn

Hiley, David; Bohman, James; Shusterman, Richard

doi:10.7591/9781501735028

Cited by 31 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The significance of this is that even within the natural sciences interpretation of phenomena takes place: descriptions of observations within the natural sciences do not straightforwardly mirror the world. Hence interpretation cannot be regarded as the distinguishing criterion of the human sciences ( Hiley et al . 1991 , Benner 1994).…”

Section: Nursing Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

The idea of nursing science

Edwards

1999

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses the question of whether or not nursing can legitimately be considered as a science. It is proposed that an adequate answer to this question requires consideration of recent developments in philosophy of science (as urged by Paley). It is shown that such developments call into question the 'rational image' of science. However, a defence of the legitimacy of the scientific enterprise has been attempted by Laudan, an advocate of the 'historical turn'. Two conditions necessary for the applicability of this 'turn' are identified. It is shown that although they apply relatively unproblematically to science, they do not readily apply to nursing. Hence the conclusion is drawn that claims for the integrity of nursing science stand in need of much further development.

show abstract

Section: Nursing Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

The idea of nursing science

Edwards

1999

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As an applied science , WOP is routed in a postmodern trajectory ( Kvale, 1992 ; Gergen, 1994 , 1995 ) and overcomes a prescriptive and routinized approach to conduct research, having been revised (or even upset) through the last decades of debates about the linguistic turn ( Wittgenstein, 1958 ), the narrative turn ( Bruner, 1986 , 1990 ; Sarbin, 1986 ; Polkingorne, 1988 ), the practice turn ( Schatzki et al, 2001 ; Reckwitz, 2002 ; Whittington, 2011 ), the reflexive turn ( Schön, 1991 ; Macbeth, 2001 ; Cunliffe, 2002 , 2003 ; Cunliffe and Easterby-Smith, 2004 ; Scaratti and Ripamonti, 2015 ), the interpretative turn ( Hiley et al, 1991 ; Reckwitz, 2002 ), and the socio-material turn ( Dameron et al, 2015 ). A different perspective of research emerges, one that can help people engaged in actual organizational contexts cope with processes of learning on the fields, connecting action and thought and trying to open new visions not yet available for transforming and improving their daily practices.…”

Section: Theoretical Framework: Toward An Epistemology Of Particular mentioning

confidence: 99%

Uniqueness and Generalization in Organizational Psychology: Research as a Relational Practice

Scaratti

Ivaldi

2021

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper addresses the epistemological and theoretical assumptions that underpin the concept of Work and Organizational Psychology as idiographic, situated, and transformative social science. Positioning the connection between uniqueness and generalization inside the debate around organization studies as applied approaches, the contribution highlights the ontological, gnoseological, and methodological implications at stake. The use of practical instead of scientific rationality is explored, through the perspective of a hermeneutic lens, underlining the main features connected to the adoption of an epistemology of practice. Specifically, the contribution depicts the configuration of the applied research as a relational practice, embedded in the unfolding process of generating knowledge dealing with concrete social contexts and particular social objects. The discussion of a case study regarding a field research project allows one to point out challenges and constraints connected to the enactment of the research process as a social accomplishment.

show abstract

“…Since the 1970s, there have been a succession of ‘inversions, reversions or redirections’ (Reed, 2005: 1621) more or less related to the cultural turn (Bachmann-Medick, 2016). Thus we have witnessed the linguistic turn (Latour and Woolgar, 1979; Rorty, [1967]1992), the interpretive turn (Hiley et al, 1991; Rabinow and Sullivan, 1979), the spatial turn (De Certeau, 1984; Lefebvre, 1991 [1974]), the narrative turn (Barthes, 1977; Ricouer, 1984) and so on; each identifying new objects of inquiry and introducing new frames of analysis. At the same time, these rearrangements in our approach and analytical categories are not seismic in the way that paradigm shifts are.…”

Section: Tracing the Sonic Turn In Social Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Listening to consumption: Towards a sonic turn in consumer research

Patterson

Larsen

2018

Marketing Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. AbstractIn seeking to orient consumer research towards the sonic, this paper has three objectives. First, to chart the emergence of the 'sonic turn' in the social sciences and, relatedly, to register the echoes of such a turn in consumer research. Second, to draw together the implications of this turn for the ontological, epistemological, and methodological foundations of consumer research as a culturallyframed social science. Third, to tease out the potential impact of the turn to sound in an intellectual context that remains relatively silent, by addressing the question: what does it mean to listen to consumption? We conclude that the sonic turn does not simply present a set of new objects for enquiry, but rather offers a fresh analytical lens that provides a non-linguistic means of appreciating consumption. Such a move opens up the space for new, alternative, and disruptive ways of thinking about and doing consumer research.

show abstract

The Interpretive Turn

Cited by 31 publications

References 0 publications

The idea of nursing science

The idea of nursing science

Uniqueness and Generalization in Organizational Psychology: Research as a Relational Practice

Listening to consumption: Towards a sonic turn in consumer research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About