2020
DOI: 10.1002/cche.10324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interrelationships between wheat quality, composition, and dough rheology for a range of Western Canadian wheat cultivars

Abstract: Background and objectives The overall goal of this research was to understand the interrelationships between wheat quality, grain and flour composition, and dough rheology for a range of commercially grown Canadian wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars (×25) within different wheat market classes. Findings Cultivar type varied in proximate analyses, which directly impacted dough handling parameters. Micro‐doughLAB absorption was positively correlated with protein content, grain hardness, wet gluten, and dry gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results found in the present work were higher than those found by Tozatti et al. (2020) who studied 25 western Canadian wheat cultivars (GI varied from 59.8 to 99), and results are in agreement with those presented by Siddiqi et al. (2020), who evaluated different wheat cultivars from north India (DG ranged from 23.46% to 43.04% and WG ranged from 8.28% to 15.00%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results found in the present work were higher than those found by Tozatti et al. (2020) who studied 25 western Canadian wheat cultivars (GI varied from 59.8 to 99), and results are in agreement with those presented by Siddiqi et al. (2020), who evaluated different wheat cultivars from north India (DG ranged from 23.46% to 43.04% and WG ranged from 8.28% to 15.00%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Environmental conditions, genotype, agronomic characteristics, crop management practices, and their interactions influence quality, processing, performance, end‐use products, and nutritional characteristics of both wheat grain and flours (Bhatta et al., 2017; Tozatti et al., 2020). Concerning technological properties, wheat genotype has a stronger effect on grain hardness and gluten proteins composition, while environmental conditions have a stronger influence on protein and mineral contents (Johansson, Branlard, et al., 2020; Johansson et al., 2013; Malik et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein and gluten properties, in particular, significantly impacted dough strength measurements. Cultivars displaying stronger gluten strengths may result in dough with better dough-handling properties ( Tozatti et al, 2020 ). Falling number (FN) and protein concentration were highly influenced by environment, whereas for SV, hardness, water absorption (WA), and loaf volume genotypes accounted for more than 60% of total variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen dough parameters were obtained from mixograph curve for the wheat genotype Mirakel grown in the C year (Figure 7). The parameters are (1) initial slope (A1/T1), ( 2) initial width (A1−B1), ( 3) initial buildup (A2−A1), ( 4) time 1-2 (T2−T1), ( 5) initial build width (A2−B2)−(A1−B1), ( 6) buildup (A3−A2), ( 7) peak time (T3), ( 8) peak width (A3−B3), ( 9) peak height ((A3+B3)/2), (10) width build (A3−B3)−(A2−B2), (11) break down (A3−A4), ( 12) end width (A5−B5), ( 13) end height ((A5+B5)/2), ( 14) area below (A1−A5), (15) area within (area between A1−A5 and B1−B5), ( 16) IHTP (integrated height to the peak), and (17) water absorption (obtained according to Wikström and Bohlin [14]). The process of mixing dough was divided into three phases, designated as water absorption (parameters 1-5), dough development (parameters 6-10), and break down of dough (parameter 11) [14,50].…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%