2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interval-training paradox: Physiological responses vs. subjective rate of perceived exertion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CT is defined as continuous training with low and moderate intensity exercises that are performed for more than 20 min without resting intervals. IT is characterized by relatively high-intensity repetitions of physical activity with periods of rest for recovery [9]. It has been widely demonstrated that CT improves aerobic capacity, skeletal muscle function, and quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT is defined as continuous training with low and moderate intensity exercises that are performed for more than 20 min without resting intervals. IT is characterized by relatively high-intensity repetitions of physical activity with periods of rest for recovery [9]. It has been widely demonstrated that CT improves aerobic capacity, skeletal muscle function, and quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exergame should be able to adapt to the individual patient at a physical and cognitive level to meet the heterogeneous and individual requirements of patients with MS and to allow for an optimal training zone [51,95]. For this reason, the design integrated individual levels for physical and cognitive functions into the exergames, allowing for an individually challenging game for patients with MS. To extend the playfulness and effectiveness of the exergames in the future, the assessment of certain motor and cognitive parameters (objective) or rating scales (subjective) could help to define an individual training area [99][100][101][102]. The integration of in-exergame, real-time adaptation could help to maintain a predefined optimal training zone in a training session and over a longer period (progression) [51,102,103].…”
Section: Training Intensity and Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance-related parameters could be reaction time and failure rate as well as movement execution, acceleration, deceleration, and accuracy. In addition to the objective parameters, subjective parameters (e.g., rating scales) could be used to determine the different loads ( Smith et al, 2014 ; Saw et al, 2016 ; Meckel et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%