2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Investigation of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Reflective Journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflective thinking and practice take into account different trends in the research literature. For example, while one vein of research focuses on the improvement of reflective thinking (Pavlovich, 2007;Russell, 2005), another group of research is interested in describing the levels or classification of reflective thinking (Cengiz, Karatas, & Yadigaroglu, 2014;Collier, 1999;Hatton & Smith, 1995;Jay & Johnson, 2002;Larrivee, 2008;Valli, 1997;Ward & McCotter, 2004). The striking finding of these research trends was that descriptive reflection tended to be the most common preference among preservice teachers (Cengiz et al, 2014;Hatton & Smith, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reflective thinking and practice take into account different trends in the research literature. For example, while one vein of research focuses on the improvement of reflective thinking (Pavlovich, 2007;Russell, 2005), another group of research is interested in describing the levels or classification of reflective thinking (Cengiz, Karatas, & Yadigaroglu, 2014;Collier, 1999;Hatton & Smith, 1995;Jay & Johnson, 2002;Larrivee, 2008;Valli, 1997;Ward & McCotter, 2004). The striking finding of these research trends was that descriptive reflection tended to be the most common preference among preservice teachers (Cengiz et al, 2014;Hatton & Smith, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while one vein of research focuses on the improvement of reflective thinking (Pavlovich, 2007;Russell, 2005), another group of research is interested in describing the levels or classification of reflective thinking (Cengiz, Karatas, & Yadigaroglu, 2014;Collier, 1999;Hatton & Smith, 1995;Jay & Johnson, 2002;Larrivee, 2008;Valli, 1997;Ward & McCotter, 2004). The striking finding of these research trends was that descriptive reflection tended to be the most common preference among preservice teachers (Cengiz et al, 2014;Hatton & Smith, 1995). On the other hand, based on their review, Dyment and O'Connell (2011) stated that preservice teachers could write higher quality journals if consideration was made regarding the limiting and supporting factors which influence their writing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Around the world, the studies conducted with preservice and in-service teachers in early childhood area (Beavers, Orange, & Kirkwood, 2017;Cherrington & Loveridge, 2014;Durand, Hopf, & Nunnenmacher, 2016;Foong, Binti, & Nolan, 2018;Kahles, 2015;Riojas-Cortez, Alanís, & Flores, 2013) have addressed on different aspects of reflection and reflective thinking. In Turkey, a few studies have focused on reflective journal writing of preservice teachers in different areas of education, computer and instruction technology (Akkoyunlu, Telli, Cetin, & Daghan, 2016), science (Cengiz et al, 2014) primary education (Ekiz, 2006;Koc & Yildiz, 2012), and child development and early childhood education (Isikoglu, 2007;Kucukoglu, Ozan, & Tasgin, 2016;Sahin, 2009). Although a wealth of research literature has considered journal writing as an effective tool, there continues to be a need for conducting further research in this area with early childhood preservice teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autentiška informacija apie studentų asmeninę patirtį leidžia ne tik išsamiai analizuoti kiekvieną atvejį, bet ir ugdo studentų gebėjimą reflektuoti. Tačiau tokia individuali prieiga, kai tyrimo instrumentu tampa pats tyrėjas , reikalauja didelių laiko išteklių, galima įvertinti gana nedidelį skaičių studentų (Stephenson, 2017), be to, studentų gebėjimas reflektuoti gali reikšmingai skirtis (Cengiz et al, 2014). Kai tyrimo klausimui nereikia tokios giluminės analizės, tyrėjai renkasi kiekybinį tyrimo dizainą.…”
unclassified