2021
DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Investigation of Social Studies Prospective Teachers’ Environmental Education Self-Efficacy in Terms of Various Variables

Abstract: The aim of this study is to investigate prospective teachers' environmental education self-efficacy in terms of various variables. Survey method was applied in the study, and the data were collected in the 2015-2016 academic year. The study group of the paper consisted of 172 prospective teachers from each grade level who are studying in Social Studies Department, Faculty of Education, Afyon Kocatepe University. The data of the study were collected with the environmental education self-efficacy scale developed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the interviews are in line with these findings. In addition, the results of the analysis conducted by Kaya et al (2021) concluded that prospective teachers' self-efficacy in environmental education was moderate, and the perceived self-efficacy level of prospective teachers did not show significant differences with respect to gender and grade variables. In a similar way, Praimee et al ( 2022) carried out a study in northeast Thailand and found that there were no differences in knowledge scores and attitudes toward wetland management between students of different genders.…”
Section: Theme 2 Relation Between Environmental Education and Other V...mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from the interviews are in line with these findings. In addition, the results of the analysis conducted by Kaya et al (2021) concluded that prospective teachers' self-efficacy in environmental education was moderate, and the perceived self-efficacy level of prospective teachers did not show significant differences with respect to gender and grade variables. In a similar way, Praimee et al ( 2022) carried out a study in northeast Thailand and found that there were no differences in knowledge scores and attitudes toward wetland management between students of different genders.…”
Section: Theme 2 Relation Between Environmental Education and Other V...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some studies have investigated the relationship between environmental education and some variables that may be related to it. In these studies, the relationship between environmental education and factors such as gender (Kaya et al, 2021;Onal, 2020;Praimee et al, 2022), school years and departments (Ozonur, 2021), environmental literacy, environmental awareness (Dolenc Orbanic & Kovac, 2021;Khobotova et al, 2022) and attitudes towards environmental education are mostly questioned. Some researchers have conducted some experimental studies to increase the effectiveness of environmental education and as a result, they have determined that these activities contribute to the development of environmental education (Aksut & Aydin, 2021;Ayaz et al, 2021;Bardecki & McCarthy, 2020;Corpuz et al, 2022;Fettahlioglu, 2018;Hamalosmanoglu et al, 2020;Nogales-Delgado & Encinar Martín, 2019;Sims et al, 2020;Sookngam et al, 2021;Wongchantra et al, 2022aWongchantra et al, , 2022b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kompetensi profesional keguruan ESD yang dikenal pasti daripada SLR yang dilakukan adalah melibatkan pengetahuan profesional ESD guru iaitu pengetahuan isi kandungan ESD guru (PIK-ESD) (Anđić, 2020;Bagoly-Simó et al, 2017;Bertschy et al, 2013;Brandt et al, 2019;Bürgener & Barth, 2017;Dumitrescu et al, 2014;Lambrechts et al, 2013;Liu & Qi, 2021;Malandrakis et al, 2018;Mróz et al, 2018;Ofei-Manu & Didham, 2018;Rauch & Steiner, 2013;Rosenkränzer et al, 2017;Timm & Barth, 2020;Weng et al, 2020) dan juga pengetahuan pedagogi-isi kandungan ESD guru (PPIK-ESD) (Bagoly-Simó et al, 2017;Bertschy et al, 2013;Brandt et al, 2019;Bürgener & Barth, 2017;Dumitrescu et al, 2014;Fedosejeva et al, 2018;Garrido et al, 2020;Kaya et al, 2021;Liu & Qi, 2021;Malandrakis et al, 2018;Mogensen & Schnack, 2010;Naji, 2015;Ofei-Manu & Didham, 2018;Ou et al, 2021;Rauch & Steiner, 2013;Rosenkränzer et al, 2017;Sund, 2015;Timm & Barth, 2020;Weng et al, 2020). PIK-ESD guru adalah berbeza dengan PPIK-ESD guru tetapi PIK-ESD diperlukan guru untuk membentuk PPIK-ESD mereka (Rosenkränzer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Kompetensi Profesional Keguruan Esdunclassified
“…Selain daripada kompetensi profesional keguruan ESD, guru juga perlu mempunyai kompetensi intrapersonal ESD melibatkan aspek motivasi yang dimiliki guru (Bertschy et al, 2013;Brandt et al, 2019;Bürgener & Barth, 2017;Cebrián & Junyent, 2015;Garrido et al, 2020;Ofei-Manu & Didham, 2018) serta keyakinan dan kesediaan guru (Bertschy et al, 2013;Brandt et al, 2019;Bürgener & Barth, 2017;Kaya et al, 2021;Ofei-Manu & Didham, 2018;Vare et al, 2019) untuk menerapkan konsep ESD dalam pengajaran. Guru perlu mempunyai motivasi yang tinggi untuk menerapkan konsep ESD dalam pengajaran bagi membolehkan proses penerapan berlaku secara optima.…”
Section: Kompetensi Intrapersonal Esd Guruunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation