The Invisible Black Victim: How American Federalism Perpetuates Racial Inequality in Criminal Justice

Abstract

The promise of civil rights is the promise of inclusion; yet the vast disparity in incarceration rates between blacks, Latinos, and whites stands as an ugly reminder of the nation's long history of race‐based exclusionary practices. In this article, I argue that an important aspect of understanding race and the law in the twenty‐first century is an appreciation of the American federal system that structures legal authority, political mobilization, and policy solutions and serves as an important and overlooked obstacle to more complete and sustained racial equality in crime and punishment in the United States. In contrast to the conventional wisdom about the role of the national government in protecting the rights of minorities and other disadvantaged groups, I suggest that crime and justice are arenas where the nationalization of issues has left the most important constituents behind. In fact, local crime politics provides a space where there is regular and ongoing articulation of the inclusionary goals of the civil rights agenda and sustained efforts to move forward in realizing that agenda through meaningful community involvement in promoting public safety, economic development, and social justice. This article explores these themes and offers a discussion of the linkages between federalism, racial inequality and crime, victimization and punishment.

What’s violence got to do with it? Inequality, punishment, and state failure in US politics

“…While scholarly work has rightly observed the disproportionate use of imprisonment for the poor and minorities, the neglect of violence has overlooked the daily threat to these same individuals, families and communities that real violence imposes (but see Forman, 2012;Fortner, 2013;Kleiman, 2010;Miller, 2010).…”

Triple Stigma of Forensic Psychiatric Patients: Mental Illness, Race, and Criminal History

“…Negative portrayals of forensic psychiatric patients as dangerous, aggressive, and unpredictable overlap with attitudes about racial minorities. Moreover, multiple policies contribute to the demonstrated racial disparities in incarceration, with particularly elevated incarceration rates for Black males (Miller, 2010;Pettit & Western, 2004;Schlesinger, 2011). Racial inequality in incarceration has been described as a predominant mechanism for the continued marginalization of racial minorities and for perpetuating societal power hierarchies (e.g., Alexander, 2010).…”

Studying the information needs of e-governance stakeholders: Environmental justice as a context for tool development

“…In practice federalism has been particularly difficult for environmental stakeholders to navigate and now complicates the flow of information in the virtual world. Federalism delineates responsibilities of the federal government from those of state and local governments, while at the same time entangling these responsibilities [38].…”

“…Based upon many power-sharing arrangements, government in the U.S. localizes environmental hazards by addressing them on a state by state basis, rather than centrally by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Consequently, the full scope of n environmental injustice environmental injustice is difficult to discern because the circumstances in individual municipalities, counties, or states may appear to be unrelated from the others [38]. The federalist system of governance limits both contextual understandings of injustices as well as comparative analyses across injustices.…”