1985
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90070-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The involvement of monkey premotor cortex neurones in preparation of visually cued arm movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
71
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that PM was found in the source reconstruction of both comparisons is in line with previous neuroimaging studies that have consistently shown the involvement of the PM cortex during the processing of action language (Papeo et al, 2009;Pulvermüller et al, 1999;Raposo et al, 2009;Schuil et al, 2013;Tomasino et al, 2008;Willems et al, 2010). In addition, other studies have shown that the dorsal PM is particularly activated during the preparation of movements (Godschalk et al, 1985;Halsband and Freund, 1990;Passingham, 1988), which fits well with the fact that sentences in this study were constructed in future tense (Candidi et al, 2010). The differential suppression of mu was also observed in the superior temporal gyrus (BA 39), while participants were reading the final word of congruent action sentences (contrast congruent action -abstract; Fig.…”
Section: Mu Suppression In Action Languagesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The fact that PM was found in the source reconstruction of both comparisons is in line with previous neuroimaging studies that have consistently shown the involvement of the PM cortex during the processing of action language (Papeo et al, 2009;Pulvermüller et al, 1999;Raposo et al, 2009;Schuil et al, 2013;Tomasino et al, 2008;Willems et al, 2010). In addition, other studies have shown that the dorsal PM is particularly activated during the preparation of movements (Godschalk et al, 1985;Halsband and Freund, 1990;Passingham, 1988), which fits well with the fact that sentences in this study were constructed in future tense (Candidi et al, 2010). The differential suppression of mu was also observed in the superior temporal gyrus (BA 39), while participants were reading the final word of congruent action sentences (contrast congruent action -abstract; Fig.…”
Section: Mu Suppression In Action Languagesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Figure 5A shows example delay-period responses of four neurons, locked to the onset of the target. Consistent with previous work (Weinrich and Wise, 1982;Weinrich et al, 1984;Godschalk et al, 1985;Crammond and Kalaska, 2000), we found that many PMd neurons showed a sudden change in mean firing rate after target onset. Such changes were then approximately sustained, although usually with some "drift" in mean firing rate over the course of the delay.…”
Section: Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Reaction times (RTs) (from the go cue until movement onset) are shorter when delays are longer, suggesting that some time-consuming preparatory process is given a head start by the delay (Rosenbaum, 1980;Riehle and Requin, 1989;Crammond and Kalaska, 2000). Neurons in a number of brain areas, including dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), exhibit activity during the delay (Tanji and Evarts, 1976;Weinrich and Wise, 1982;Weinrich et al, 1984;Godschalk et al, 1985;Kurata, 1989;Riehle and Requin, 1989;Snyder et al, 1997). Delay-period activity is typically tuned for the instruction and can be predictive of RT (Riehle and Requin, 1993;Bastian et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and effective connectivity While there may be variable degrees of latency to activity after epicortical stimulation [82], it is likely that single pulse stimulation of up to 10 mA results in activation within 2-4 ms [83]. The latency of peaks in the CCEP suggests an oligo-or polysynaptic propagation pathway for both the N1 and N2 components.…”
Section: Relationship Between Anatomical Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%