2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The iSeM matchmaker: A flexible approach for adaptive hybrid semantic service selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These systems are OWLSM (Jaeger et al, 2005), OWLS-MX , and iSeM (Klusch, 2012). We performed the experiments on the same computer (Intel Core i5 3.30 GHz) with 2 GB of memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These systems are OWLSM (Jaeger et al, 2005), OWLS-MX , and iSeM (Klusch, 2012). We performed the experiments on the same computer (Intel Core i5 3.30 GHz) with 2 GB of memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the semantic Web domain, there are many developed matchmakers which are able to ensure the matching between a user's request and advertisements such as OWLS-UDDI (Paolucci et al, 2002), OWLSM (Jaeger et al, 2005), OWLS-MX , and iSeM (Klusch, 2012). All the presented matchmakers are not appropriate to the lingware engineering domain, since this lingware has its own features other than I/O, preconditions, and effects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the service precondition requires that the ship should be available for the P assenger and the Location should be reachable, while the effect at(psg, lc) of executing this transport service means that the P assenger eventually will be at the given Location. There is a variety of tools for the selection of semantic services for a given service request available [13] like the currently most precise service matchmaker iSeM [14].…”
Section: A 3d Scene Semantic Annotation and Querymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite a few works [12], [5] response to this need and model those properties by conceptual description and semantic Web services. Unfortunately, classic logical reasoning approaches and service matchmakers, such as [14], [13], are not adequate for the purpose of real time retrieval due to their relatively large computational complexity. Towards attacking these issues, we presented iRep3D 1.0 [4], which offers relatively more precise but real time semantic retrieval of annotated 3D scenes in terms of syntactic conceptual, behavioral and geometric features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our survey paper discusses further approaches and open issues in detail [11]. Recently, approaches for "self adaptive" matching appeared (e.g., [8]). These approaches use learning techniques in order to discover the best way to aggregate the results of several matching algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%