1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12770.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Isolation and Characterization of Elongation Factor eEF‐Ts from Krebs‐II Mouse‐Ascites‐Tumor Cells and Its Role in the Elongation Process

Abstract: A factor having activity similar to that described in other systems for the eukaryotic elongation factor eEF‐Ts was isolated from the heavy, aggregate form of eEF‐TH (formally named EF‐1H). This protein has a molecular weight of 52000 under native conditions and of 25 500 under denaturing conditions. It has been shown to stimulate eEF‐Tu‐dependent aminoacyl‐tRNA binding to ribosomes and therefore eEF‐Tu/eEF‐G‐dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis by ribosomes and was found to stimulate GDP‐GTP exchange in eEF‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Purified eEF-Tu4 retains the ability to bind GTP (Figure 3) although this binding has been reduced to about 20% of that of the native enzyme. The native enzyme bound 0.073 pmol of GTP/pmol, a value in agreement with most (Legocki et al, 1974;Slobin & Moller, 1976;Grasmuk et al, 1978) but not all (Nagata et al, 1976) studies on figure 3: Binding of [3H]GTP by eEF-Tu (•) and eEF-Tu4 (O).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Purified eEF-Tu4 retains the ability to bind GTP (Figure 3) although this binding has been reduced to about 20% of that of the native enzyme. The native enzyme bound 0.073 pmol of GTP/pmol, a value in agreement with most (Legocki et al, 1974;Slobin & Moller, 1976;Grasmuk et al, 1978) but not all (Nagata et al, 1976) studies on figure 3: Binding of [3H]GTP by eEF-Tu (•) and eEF-Tu4 (O).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In an effort to improve the aminoacyl bond protection and the efficiency of crosslinking to the eukaryotic factors, we surveyed a range of incubation conditions which included those found optimal by various groups (e.g., 6,12,28). But the protection and crosslinking were either reduced or not significantly changed when the following changes were made in the standard protocol: 2Mg + at 1, 3, or 10 mM; ([NH4 K + J) at 15, 43, 93, 100 or 143 mM; pH at, 7.6, 7.8, or 8.0; IGTP] at 0.1 mM; addition of glycerol to 25%; or addition of bovine serum albumin to 0.5 mg/ml.…”
Section: Gtp-dependent Affinity Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%