2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Japanese version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale: Validity in participants with and without traumatic experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each item is scored on a 4-point scale of symptom frequency, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. The Japanese version of PDS has demonstrated good reliability and validity 59,63 . We administered Parts 1 & 2 to all participants in order to determine the presence/absence of traumatic experiences, and if present, Parts 3 & 4 were administered for the assessment of diagnosis and severity of PTSD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item is scored on a 4-point scale of symptom frequency, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. The Japanese version of PDS has demonstrated good reliability and validity 59,63 . We administered Parts 1 & 2 to all participants in order to determine the presence/absence of traumatic experiences, and if present, Parts 3 & 4 were administered for the assessment of diagnosis and severity of PTSD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used data from the PDS and CAPS collected in our previous study (Itoh et al, 2017) with clinical and non-clinical samples ( N = 225). The data were screened and excluded if (1) the complete item data were not accessible ( n = 3) or (2) there was no listed traumatic event in the checklist on Part 1 of the PDS ( n = 53, nearly half of the non-clinical sample).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Japanese version (Itoh et al, 2017) was used in this study; its validity is high (AUC of .97 against the CAPS diagnosis, the sensitivity of 97.0%, and specificity of 93.6%). The PDS comprises four parts assessing traumatic experiences (Part 1 and 2), symptom severity over the past month corresponding to Criteria B–D of the DSM-IV (Part 3), and functional disorder (Part 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we administered Parts 1 & 2 to all participants for the assessment of presence/absence of traumatic experiences and Parts 3 & 4 to only patients for the assessment of PTSD diagnosis. We have previously shown that the PTSD diagnosis concordance rate between the PDS and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (22), a structured interview for the diagnosis of PTSD, was very high (95.1%, k = 0.90) (23).…”
Section: Assessment Of Trauma Experience Ptsd Diagnosis and Symptommentioning
confidence: 99%