2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Joker” laugh: Social judgments towards affective deviants in a sample of young offenders with callous unemotional traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, it may be argued that some ICU subscales' reliability partially varies according to culture [37]. However, we used a translated version of ICU that was previously applied to Colombian samples [52]. Future cross-cultural research on the association of CU traits and implicit violent cognition should be conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, it may be argued that some ICU subscales' reliability partially varies according to culture [37]. However, we used a translated version of ICU that was previously applied to Colombian samples [52]. Future cross-cultural research on the association of CU traits and implicit violent cognition should be conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the studies are <18 min and this can be considered satisfactory; especially considering the works on the scarce reliability of long (>20 min) online studies (Revilla & Höhne, 2020; Revilla & Ochoa, 2017). Moreover, trustworthiness and creepiness were measured by using a 7‐point scale in previous online research on face perception (Olivera La Rosa et al., 2020; Olivera‐La Rosa et al., 2021). Participants responded to the shared moral values scale (Szczurek et al., 2012), by indicating how much they felt the target face shared their moral values (‘I feel the target individual shares most of the same moral values as me’), using a 6‐point scale ranging from 1 ( strongly disagree ) to 6 ( strongly agree ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants responded to the shared moral values scale (Szczurek et al, 2012), by indicating how much they felt the target face shared their moral values ('I feel the target individual shares most of the same moral values as me'), using a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The shared moral values scale was used as a 6-point scale as in previous research (Olivera-La Rosa et al, 2021;Szczurek et al, 2012).…”
Section: Social Judgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation