2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68920-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kalahari Craton, Southern Africa: From Archean Crustal Evolution to Gondwana Amalgamation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age is also consistent with reworking of the SCLM beneath the NW margin of the Kalahari Craton (Fig. 7) during the amalgamation of the Kheis-Okwa-Magondi Belt and the Rehoboth Terrain between 2000 -1750 Ma (Oriolo & Becker, 2018;Van Schijndel et al, 2011). This event has also been proposed to explain formation of diamonds with similar characteristics in Jagersfontein (Aulbach et al, 2009).…”
Section: Large-scale Metasomatism (Group I)supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The age is also consistent with reworking of the SCLM beneath the NW margin of the Kalahari Craton (Fig. 7) during the amalgamation of the Kheis-Okwa-Magondi Belt and the Rehoboth Terrain between 2000 -1750 Ma (Oriolo & Becker, 2018;Van Schijndel et al, 2011). This event has also been proposed to explain formation of diamonds with similar characteristics in Jagersfontein (Aulbach et al, 2009).…”
Section: Large-scale Metasomatism (Group I)supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Alternatively, this age may not yet have been recognised as most reported dates are from inclusion composites. A possible explanation for the contrast with formation of group I diamonds is that following significant growth of the Kalahari Craton through Proterozoic accretion of micro-continents along its margins (Jacobs et al, 2008;Oriolo & Becker, 2018), the controlling tectono-magmatic event was significantly further away and led to limited fluid generation and heating of the regional SCLM beneath Jwaneng at 0.85 Ga (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Small-scale Remobilization and Local Fluid Equilibration (Group Ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the south of Zimbabwe (Kamativi; Magondi Belt) and in Namaqualand on both sides of the South African/ Namibian border. The ages of Waterberg fit also well with the post-collisional magmatism as recognized in the Namaqua-Natal Belt (Oriolo and Becker, 2018). Ages concentrating between 1075 and 835 Ma were obtained by Master et al (2017) from zircons collected from the Sijarira Group in western Zimbabwe.…”
Section: Geological Context and Age Of Mineralizationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Neither granites nor metamorphism of this early Mesoproterozoic age are observed, and geochemical and isotopic data show similarities with intraplate magmatism (Oriolo et al, 2019). This 1.4-1.5 Ga event is clearly represented in the Congo Craton but is missing in the Kalahari Craton, where the Mesoproterozoic record is younger than 1.38 Ga (Oriolo and Becker, 2018). Zircon ages in the Congo Craton in north-western Namibia and south-western Angola and basement inliers of the associated Kaoko Belt also include Archean granitic gneisses (ca.…”
Section: Regional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the allochthony of the Nico Pérez Terrane and its similitude regarding Archean, Paleo-, Meso-and Neoporoterozoic events suggests that it probably represents a fragment of the Congo Craton, as several authors have proposed (Rapela et al, 2011;Oyhantçabal et al, 2011a;Oriolo et al, 2016aOriolo et al, , 2017Konopásek et al, 2018Konopásek et al, , 2020. The dominance of Archean and early to middle Paleoproterozoic ages in both the Nico Pérez Terrane and the overlying metasedimentary sequence, which are widespread in the south-western Congo Craton (e.g., Hanson, 2003;McCourt et al, 2013;Gärtner et al, 2014;Jelsma et al, 2018) and contrast significantly with the western Kalahari Craton and the zircon pattern of the Gariep Belt (e.g., Basei et al, 2005;Hofmann et al, 2014;Oriolo and Becker, 2018), may support an origin from the Angola Block of the Congo Craton. Hartmann et al, 2001;Mallmann et al, 2007;Basei et al, 2008;Gaucher et al, 2008a;Blanco et al, 2009;Rapalini et al, 2015;Pecoits et al, 2016;Gilberg, 2000) and b) eastern Dom Feliciano Belt, samples from Rocha Formation (Abre et al, 2020), Cerro Olivo Complex (Konopásek et al, 2017) and Paso del Dragón Complex (Peel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Regional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%