“…However, the allochthony of the Nico Pérez Terrane and its similitude regarding Archean, Paleo-, Meso-and Neoporoterozoic events suggests that it probably represents a fragment of the Congo Craton, as several authors have proposed (Rapela et al, 2011;Oyhantçabal et al, 2011a;Oriolo et al, 2016aOriolo et al, , 2017Konopásek et al, 2018Konopásek et al, , 2020. The dominance of Archean and early to middle Paleoproterozoic ages in both the Nico Pérez Terrane and the overlying metasedimentary sequence, which are widespread in the south-western Congo Craton (e.g., Hanson, 2003;McCourt et al, 2013;Gärtner et al, 2014;Jelsma et al, 2018) and contrast significantly with the western Kalahari Craton and the zircon pattern of the Gariep Belt (e.g., Basei et al, 2005;Hofmann et al, 2014;Oriolo and Becker, 2018), may support an origin from the Angola Block of the Congo Craton. Hartmann et al, 2001;Mallmann et al, 2007;Basei et al, 2008;Gaucher et al, 2008a;Blanco et al, 2009;Rapalini et al, 2015;Pecoits et al, 2016;Gilberg, 2000) and b) eastern Dom Feliciano Belt, samples from Rocha Formation (Abre et al, 2020), Cerro Olivo Complex (Konopásek et al, 2017) and Paso del Dragón Complex (Peel et al, 2018).…”