1980
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(80)90220-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinetics of silica-water reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

46
683
12
10

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,125 publications
(751 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
46
683
12
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimentally determined activation energies for the amide bond lie in the range between 76 kJ mol À1 and 105 kJ mol À1 , [35][36][37][38][39] the corresponding values for the siloxane bond are between 67 kJ mol À1 and 96 kJ mol À1 . 35,[40][41][42] Theoretical values are 63-113 kJ mol À1 for the amide [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] and 71-142 kJ mol À1 for the siloxane bond. [50][51][52][53][54] Bershtein et al, who have studied the mechanically activated hydrolysis of C(O)-N and Si-O bonds in bulk material in moisture, have found activation energies between 84 kJ mol À1 and 105 kJ mol À1 for C(O)-N and 80 kJ mol À1 -96 kJ mol À1 for Si-O.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally determined activation energies for the amide bond lie in the range between 76 kJ mol À1 and 105 kJ mol À1 , [35][36][37][38][39] the corresponding values for the siloxane bond are between 67 kJ mol À1 and 96 kJ mol À1 . 35,[40][41][42] Theoretical values are 63-113 kJ mol À1 for the amide [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] and 71-142 kJ mol À1 for the siloxane bond. [50][51][52][53][54] Bershtein et al, who have studied the mechanically activated hydrolysis of C(O)-N and Si-O bonds in bulk material in moisture, have found activation energies between 84 kJ mol À1 and 105 kJ mol À1 for C(O)-N and 80 kJ mol À1 -96 kJ mol À1 for Si-O.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature dependence of the (high strain) friction coefficient of muscovite under hydrous conditions is poorly known, though recent work by Mariani et al [2006] suggests little temperature effect. Previous work on pressure solution compaction in quartz sands has shown that pressure solution is probably dissolution rate controlled under upper to midcrustal conditions, so we have used the dissolution rate law reported by Rimstidt and Barnes [1980] to describe the rate limiting step of pressure solution. The geometrical parameters in our high-velocity model were taken in the middle range already mentioned in the application of our model to the experimental results (see also Table 1).…”
Section: Application To Naturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our calculation, we have assumed an aseismic creep rate of 10 À3 mm s À1 (or 30 mm yr À1 ) and a coseismic slip rate of 1 m s À1 , based on GPS measurements across the San Andreas Fault and previous estimates of coseismic slip rates [e.g., Becker et al, 2004;Scholz, 2002]. We have again used the dissolution rate law reported by Rimstidt and Barnes [1980] to describe the rate limiting step of pressure solution . As phyllosilicates have been reported both to increase [Bjørkum, 1996;Dewers and Ortoleva, 1991;Renard et al, 2001] and decrease IPS compaction rates , we also show model curves for increased (10 times) and decreased (10 times) dissolution rates (see Figure 11).…”
Section: Implications For Seismogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although many other experiments performed at lower pressures [Lasaga, 1984;Blunt and Stillings, 1995] measure quartz rates that are slower than feldspar reaction rates, Heald [ 1955] showed that under stress the solution rate of quartz may be greatly enhanced relative to feldspars. Another interesting point is that reaction rates that fit the permeability data are constant with temperature and stress, although they are expected to increase with temperature [Rimstidt and Barnes, 1980]. It is not clear why rates in the experimental system are not a strong function of temperature and stress, but Hickman and Evans [1995] showed that under pressure solution conditions temperature may have little effect on dissolution rates.…”
Section: Discussion Of Modeling Results To the Experimental System Inmentioning
confidence: 99%