1956
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-0564(08)60543-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kinetics of the Cracking of Cumene by Silica-Alumina Catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

1960
1960
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ) it can be deduced that, under our experimental conditions, the system can be described in accordance with Bassett and Habgood's postulates as first-order kinetics, r = kP,,, the rate-controlling step being the surface reaction (15). From this, the cracking of alkylaromatic hydrocarbons with our catalyst appears to follow a kinetic scheme analogous to that proposed by Prater and Lago (4). verified by other authors for other kinds of cracking catalysts (3, 5 , 6, 16, 17).…”
Section: -X Fsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…1 ) it can be deduced that, under our experimental conditions, the system can be described in accordance with Bassett and Habgood's postulates as first-order kinetics, r = kP,,, the rate-controlling step being the surface reaction (15). From this, the cracking of alkylaromatic hydrocarbons with our catalyst appears to follow a kinetic scheme analogous to that proposed by Prater and Lago (4). verified by other authors for other kinds of cracking catalysts (3, 5 , 6, 16, 17).…”
Section: -X Fsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Over the years, Voorhies's work gained increasing support as evidenced by the number of investigators that have reported a good agreement between (1) and experimentally measured coke deposition rates (e.g., Rudershausen and Watson, 1954;Prater and Lago, 1956;Wilson and Den Herder, 1958;Andrews, 1959;Butt et al, 1975). Over the years, Voorhies's work gained increasing support as evidenced by the number of investigators that have reported a good agreement between (1) and experimentally measured coke deposition rates (e.g., Rudershausen and Watson, 1954;Prater and Lago, 1956;Wilson and Den Herder, 1958;Andrews, 1959;Butt et al, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…formation of carbonaceous deposits of higher hydrocarbons and carbon itself) [1][2][3][4][5] leads to the deactivation of catalysts used in different petrochemical processes. The removal of these substances by "coke buming" is a reaction, which has to be executed very carefully to prevent hot spots (areas with higher temperatures) that may lead to a sintering processes [6][7][8] in the catalyst, causing permanent deactivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%