2017
DOI: 10.1017/s030500411700055x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ℓ-parity conjecture over the constant quadratic extension

Abstract: For a prime ℓ and an abelian variety A over a global field K, the ℓ-parity conjecture predicts that, in accordance with the ideas of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer, the Z ℓ -corank of the ℓ 8 -Selmer group and the analytic rank agree modulo 2. Assuming that char K ą 0, we prove that the ℓ-parity conjecture holds for the base change of A to the constant quadratic extension if ℓ is odd, coprime to char K, and does not divide the degree of every polarization of A. The techniques involved in the proof include the étale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this appendix, for a principally polarised abelian variety A over a number field K, we study the parity of dim F 2 X 0 (A/L) [2] where L/K is a finite field extension. The result is Proposition A.1 and has been independently observed by Česnavičius [6,Lemma 3.4]. As a consequence, we remove the assumption in two theorems of T. and V. Dokchtiser ([12, Theorem 1.6(b)] and [13,Theorem 1.6]) that the princpal polarisation on the abelian variety in question is induced by a rational divisor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this appendix, for a principally polarised abelian variety A over a number field K, we study the parity of dim F 2 X 0 (A/L) [2] where L/K is a finite field extension. The result is Proposition A.1 and has been independently observed by Česnavičius [6,Lemma 3.4]. As a consequence, we remove the assumption in two theorems of T. and V. Dokchtiser ([12, Theorem 1.6(b)] and [13,Theorem 1.6]) that the princpal polarisation on the abelian variety in question is induced by a rational divisor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Theorem 1.3 (or rather Theorem 3.2 from which we deduce it) is likely known to experts though we have not found it in the literature in this generality. Klagsbrun, Mazur and Rubin give an alternate proof of the elliptic curves case, originally due to Kramer, in [19,Theorem 3.9] and Česnavičius generalises their setup to higher dimension in [6,Theorem 5.9]. This would likely give an alternate approach to proving Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof Let scriptH be the Cartier dual of scriptG. By [, 5.3], the images of prefixlocnfalse(scriptGfalse) and prefixloc2nfalse(scriptHfalse) are orthogonal complements under the sum of cup product pairings Hnfalse(Kv,scriptGfalse)×H2nfalse(Kv,scriptHfalse)H2false(Kv,Gmfalse)invvQ/Z.By Proposition and the discreteness of H2false(Kv,Gmfalse) supplied by [, 3.5 (b)], these pairings are continuous, so the claim follows.…”
Section: Discreteness Of the Image Of Global Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof Exactness up to H1false(U,scriptGfalse) amounts to and the definition of Sel(G). By [, 5.3], Imfalse(loc1(G)false)vUH1false(Kv,scriptGfalse)andImfalse(loc1(H)false)vUH1false(Kv,scriptHfalse)are (closed) orthogonal complements under the sum of the pairings , and hence, by [, III.28, Corollary 1] and [, 24.10], so are Imfalse(loc1(G)false)+vUSelfalse(GKvfalse)vUH1false(Kv,scriptGfalse)andImfalse(loc1(H)|prefixSelfalse(scriptHfalse)false)vUH1false(Kv,scriptHfalse).We therefore arrive at further orthogonal complements ImH1(U,G)vUH1(Kv,G)<...>…”
Section: Cassels–poitou–tatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the function ǫ is not a homomorphism for J/Q so that half of the 2-Selmer ranks of the quadratic twists of J are even and half odd. On the other hand, J has κ = 3 16 and odd 2 ∞ -Selmer rank, so that 19/32 of the twists of J have even 2 ∞ -Selmer rank and 13/32 odd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%