2017
DOI: 10.1002/pssr.201700143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The La(Fe,Mn,Si)13Hz magnetic phase transition under pressure

Abstract: We study the magnetocaloric metamagnetic transition in LaFe11.74Mn0.06Si1.20 and LaFe11.76Mn0.06Si1.18H1.65 under hydrostatic pressure up to 1.2 GPa. For both compounds, hydrostatic pressure depresses the zero field critical temperature. However, in detail, pressure influences the magnetic properties in different ways in the two compounds. In the dehydrogenated case the transition broadens under pressure whereas in the hydrogenated case the transition sharpens. In both cases thermal hysteresis increases under … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…La(Fe,Si)13 with Co substitutionally doped on to the Fe sites (with TC control of the order of 2 K) [11,12,24] produces a second order broad transition at high Co concentration with impaired ΔS and ΔTad performance compared to the base material [11,12], and more accurate targeting of TC near RT is difficult due to very reliable variations in Co content of the order of 1% required. This is similarly the case for Mn doping followed by full hydrogenation (a first-order transition) [17,[25][26][27]. However, a significant advantage in having a broad transition is that it offers a greater effective operation temperature range per composition, relaxing the stringency on the step size of TC in a cascaded set to perhaps 3 K. Nevertheless, accurate and reliable targeting of any compound's TC is a strong advantage for future scale-up of MCE refrigerant production.…”
Section: Two Vital Considerations Towards the Implementation Of Magnementioning
confidence: 94%
“…La(Fe,Si)13 with Co substitutionally doped on to the Fe sites (with TC control of the order of 2 K) [11,12,24] produces a second order broad transition at high Co concentration with impaired ΔS and ΔTad performance compared to the base material [11,12], and more accurate targeting of TC near RT is difficult due to very reliable variations in Co content of the order of 1% required. This is similarly the case for Mn doping followed by full hydrogenation (a first-order transition) [17,[25][26][27]. However, a significant advantage in having a broad transition is that it offers a greater effective operation temperature range per composition, relaxing the stringency on the step size of TC in a cascaded set to perhaps 3 K. Nevertheless, accurate and reliable targeting of any compound's TC is a strong advantage for future scale-up of MCE refrigerant production.…”
Section: Two Vital Considerations Towards the Implementation Of Magnementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other promising " natural" multicalorics with I order phase transitions are alloys based on La−Fe−Si with a " giant" MCE. Thus, for instance, an alloy of hydrogenated La−Fe−Si with " giant" values of BCE and MCE was suggested for the multicaloric cooling concept [43]. The multicaloric approach can be also implemented using ferroelectric materials with a " giant" ECE in the region of a structural phase transition.…”
Section: Materials With Structural Phase Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy dissipated during the multicaloric cycle shown (red dashed line) is given to a good approximation by |∆p∆v|, where ∆p = p2 -p1 and ∆v is the difference in specific volumes for the two phases (Figure 4b) 23 . Experimentally, these kind of multicaloric cycles have been realized using Fe-Rh 23 and La-Fe-Mn-Si 32 .…”
Section: Multicaloric Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%